BMJ 1999;319:619-622 ( 4 September )

Information in practice

Identifying problems with data collection at a local level: survey of NHS maternity units in England

Natalie Kenney, survey researcherAlison Macfarlane, reader in perinatal and public health statistics

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF

Correspondence to: A Macfarlane alison.macfarlane{at}perinat.ox.ac.uk

Objectives: To document the extent to which maternity data are collected and how they are recorded, and to identify problems that may affect their availability throughout the NHS.
Methods: Postal survey in September 1997 with structured questionnaires.
Setting: 207 NHS trusts with maternity units in England.
Participants: Heads of midwifery in maternity units.
Main outcome measures: Extent to which maternity data were routinely recorded, how they were recorded and evaluated, and to whom they were made available.
Results: 167 (81%) of questionnaires were returned, representing 166 trusts. Of these trusts, 165 collected >= 17 of the 19 data items in HES maternity tail, and 158 collected >= 40 of the 45 items selected from Körner dataset. Only 18 collected all five items selected from the "indicators of success," and 17 did not collect any. In 58 of trusts data were primarily recorded on paper. A computerised maternity information system was used by 106 (63%) of trusts, but many recorded data on paper first. Thirty four did not audit data for accuracy. Most trusts analysed data not routinely collected at national level, but 18 did not analyse HES maternity tail and 17 did not analyse Körner data.
Conclusions: Improvement is needed in quality, completeness, and availability of maternity data at a national level, particularly if the NHS information strategy is to be successfully implemented. Although most of the data items in national datasets are recorded locally, variations in the way data are defined, recorded, and analysed and lack of linkage between computer systems restrict their access, availability, and use at local, district, and national levels.


Key messages

  • Most NHS maternity data missing at a national level are collected at a local level

  • Variations in the way in which maternity data are defined, recorded, audited, and analysed can affect the quality, completeness, and availability of this information throughout the NHS

  • Considerable work and investment will be required to implement the plans set out in the NHS information strategy Information for Health





© BMJ 1999

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Information and intelligence for healthy populations
Rosalind Raine, Sylvia Godden, and Martin McKee
BMJ 2006 332: 1226-1227. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Raine, R., Godden, S., McKee, M. (2006). Information and intelligence for healthy populations.. BMJ 332: 1226-1227 [Full text]  
  • Wilson, A. S., Kitas, G. D., Carruthers, D. M., Reay, C., Skan, J., Harris, S., Treharne, G. J., Young, S. P., Bacon, P. A. (2002). Computerized information-gathering in specialist rheumatology clinics: an initial evaluation of an electronic version of the Short Form 36. Rheumatology (Oxford) 41: 268-273 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Heller, R F, Page, J (2002). A population perspective to evidence based medicine: ""evidence for population health"". J. Epidemiol. Community Health 56: 45-47 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rickwood, A M K, Kenny, S E, Donnell, S C (2000). Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice. BMJ 321: 792-793 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ