Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Natalie Kenney National
Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3
7LF
Correspondence to: A Macfarlane
alison.macfarlane{at}perinat.ox.ac.uk
Objectives:
To document the extent to which maternity data are collected and how they are recorded, and to identify problems
that may affect their availability throughout the NHS.
Methods:
Postal survey in September 1997 with
structured questionnaires.
Setting:
207 NHS trusts with maternity units in England.
Participants:
Heads of midwifery in maternity units.
Main outcome measures:
Extent to which maternity data
were routinely recorded, how they were recorded and evaluated, and to
whom they were made available.
Results:
167 (81%) of questionnaires were returned, representing 166 trusts. Of these trusts, 165 collected
17 of the 19 data items in HES maternity tail, and 158 collected
40 of the 45 items selected from Körner dataset. Only 18 collected all five items
selected from the "indicators of success," and 17 did not collect
any. In 58 of trusts data were primarily recorded on paper. A
computerised maternity information system was used by 106 (63%) of
trusts, but many recorded data on paper first. Thirty four did not
audit data for accuracy. Most trusts analysed data not routinely
collected at national level, but 18 did not analyse HES maternity tail
and 17 did not analyse Körner data.
Conclusions:
Improvement is needed in quality,
completeness, and availability of maternity data at a national level,
particularly if the NHS information strategy is to be successfully
implemented. Although most of the data items in national datasets are
recorded locally, variations in the way data are defined, recorded, and analysed and lack of linkage between computer systems restrict their
access, availability, and use at local, district, and national levels.
Key messages
© BMJ 1999