Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
David R Meddings a Unit of the Chief Medical Officer, International
Committee of the Red Cross, 19 avenue de la Paix, 1202 Geneva,
Switzerland , b Health Operations Division,
International Committee of the Red Cross, 19 avenue de la Paix,
1202 Geneva
Correspondence to: Dr Meddings dmeddings{at}icrc.org
Objective:
To examine the circumstances surrounding
weapon injury and combatant status of those injured by weapons.
Design:
Prospective cohort study.
Setting:
Northwestern Cambodia after departure of
United Nations peacekeeping force.
Subjects:
863 people admitted to hospital for weapon injuries over 12 months.
Main outcome measures:
Annual incidence of weapon
injury by time period; proportions of injuries inflicted as a result of
interfactional combat (combat injuries) and outside such combat
(non-combat injuries) by combatant status and weapon type.
Results:
The annual incidence of weapon injuries was higher than the rate observed before the peacekeeping operation. 30%
of weapon injuries occurred in contexts other than interfactional combat. Most commonly these were firearm injuries inflicted
intentionally on civilians. Civilians accounted for 71% of those with
non-combat injuries, 42% of those with combat related injuries, and
51% of those with weapon injuries of either type.
Conclusions:
The incidence of weapon injuries
remained high when the disarmament component of a peacekeeping
operation achieved only limited success. Furthermore, injuries
occurring outside the context of interfactional combat accounted for a
substantial proportion of all weapon injuries, were experienced
disproportionately by civilians, and were most likely to entail the
intentional use of a firearm against a civilian.
Key messages