Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jennifer Klaber Moffett a Centre for Health Economics, University of York,
York, b Department of Health
Sciences and Clinical Evaluation, University of York, c Department of Medical
Statistics and Evaluation, Imperial College School of Medicine,
University of London
Correspondence to: J Klaber Moffett,
Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull, Hull HU3 2PG
j.a.moffett{at}medschool.hull.ac.uk
Objective:
To evaluate effectiveness of an exercise
programme in a community setting for patients with low back pain to
encourage a return to normal activities.
Design:
Randomised controlled trial of progressive exercise programme compared with usual primary care management. Patients' preferences for type of management were elicited
independently of randomisation.
Participants:
187 patients aged 18-60 years with
mechanical low back pain of 4 weeks to 6 months' duration.
Interventions:
Exercise classes led by a
physiotherapist that included strengthening exercises for all main
muscle groups, stretching exercises, relaxation session, and brief
education on back care. A cognitive-behavioural approach was used.
Main outcome measures:
Assessments of debilitating
effects of back pain before and after intervention and at 6 months and
1 year later. Measures included Roland disability questionnaire,
Aberdeen back pain scale, pain diaries, and use of healthcare services.
Results:
At 6 weeks after randomisation, the
intervention group improved marginally more than the control group on
the disability questionnaire and reported less distressing pain. At 6 months and 1 year, the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in the disability questionnaire score (mean difference in
changes 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 2.57). At 1 year, the
intervention group also showed significantly greater improvement in the
Aberdeen back pain scale (4.44, 1.01 to 7.87) and reported only 378 days off work compared with 607 in the control group. The intervention
group used fewer healthcare resources. Outcome was not influenced by
patients' preferences.
Conclusions:
The exercise class was more clinically
effective than traditional general practitioner management, regardless
of patient preference, and was cost effective.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses