BMJ 1999;319:164-167 ( 17 July )

General Practice

Improving quality in general practice: qualitative case study of barriers faced by health authorities

Martin N Marshall, senior lecturer. 

Institute of General Practice, Postgraduate School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW

m.n.marshall{at}exeter.ac.uk

Objectives: To identify and assess the barriers that health authorities face as they manage quality improvements in general practice in the context of the NHS reforms.
Design: Qualitative case study.
Setting: Three UK health authorities: a rural health authority in the south west, a deprived inner city health authority in the north east, and an affluent suburban health authority in the south east.
Participants: Senior and junior managers.
Main outcome measures: Structure of strategic and organisational management, and barriers to the leadership and management of quality improvement in general practice.
Results: Seven barriers were identified: absence of an explicit strategic plan for general practice, competing priorities for attention of the health authority, sensitivity of health professionals, lack of information due to poor quality of clinical data, lack of authority to implement change, unclear roles and responsibilities of managers within the organisations, and isolation from other authorities or organisations facing similar challenges.
Conclusions: The health authorities faced significant barriers that would impede their ability to fulfil their responsibilities in the new NHS and that would reduce their capacity to contribute to quality improvements in general practice.

Key messages Health authorities fail to take a strategic approach to improving quality in general practice Doctors and health authority managers do not work sufficiently closely together to improve the quality of general practice Health authority managers seem to lack the authority and organisational structure to maximise the role in general practice expected of them in the NHS reforms

---

© BMJ 1999
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Health authorities fail to manage quality improvement in general practice
BMJ 1999 319: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation 27: 237-246 [Abstract]  
• AL-Ahmadi, H., Roland, M. (2005). Quality of primary health care in Saudi Arabia: a comprehensive review. Int J Qual Health Care 17: 331-346 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bradley, E H, Holmboe, E S, Mattera, J A, Roumanis, S A, Radford, M J, Krumholz, H M (2004). Data feedback efforts in quality improvement: lessons learned from US hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 26-31 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Henriksen, E., Rosenqvist, U. (2002). Understanding and Practice: A 7-Year Follow-Up Study on Implementation of a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program. Qual Health Res 12: 671-684 [Abstract]  
• Joesbury, H, Mathers, N, Lane, P (2001). Supporting GPs whose performance gives cause for concern: the North Trent experience. Fam Pract 18: 123-130 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Tackling data quality

Sheila Teasdale
bmj.com, 16 Jul 1999 [Full text]

Organisational Culture

Dave Young
bmj.com, 18 Jul 1999 [Full text]

SENSITIVITY OF PRACTITIONERS MAY BE A FUNCTION OF INSENSITIVITY OF MANAGERS

Diane Barnes
bmj.com, 19 Jul 1999 [Full text]

Illuminating the Health Care Facade

David Kernick
bmj.com, 3 Aug 1999 [Full text]

Barriers in the NHS - is there a pattern?

Alicia O'Cathain
bmj.com, 9 Aug 1999 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more here>> and here>>