Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Nicholas Dunn a Drug Safety Research Unit, Bursledon Hall,
Southampton SO31 1AA, b London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1 6FH, c Department of Organisational Psychology,
Manchester School of Management, UMIST, PO Box 88, Manchester
M60 1QD, d Department of Public Health, Greater Glasgow Health Board,
Dalian House, PO Box 15327, Glasgow G3 8YU, e Medicines Monitoring Unit, Department of Clinical
Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ninewells Hospital Medical School,
Dundee DD1 9SY, f Department of Surgery,
South Manchester University Hospital, West Didsbury, Manchester
M20 8LR, g Wolfson Unit of Clinical Pharmacology, University of
Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH
Correspondence to: Dr Dunn
ndunn{at}dsru.u-net.com
Objectives:
To determine the association between
myocardial infarction and use of different types of oral contraception
in young women.
Design:
Community based case-control study. Data from interviews and general practice records.
Setting:
England, Scotland, and Wales.
Participants:
Cases (n=448) were recruited from women
aged between 16 and 44 who had suffered an incident myocardial infarction between 1 October 1993 and 16 October 1995. Controls (n=1728) were women without
a diagnosis of myocardial infarction matched for age and general practice.
Main outcome measures:
Odds ratios for myocardial
infarction in current users of all combined oral contraceptives
stratified by their progestagen content compared with non-users;
current users of third generation versus second generation oral contraceptives.
Results:
The adjusted odds ratio for myocardial
infarction was 1.40 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 2.52) for all
combined oral contraceptive users, 1.10 (0.52 to 2.30) for second
generation users, and 1.96 (0.87 to 4.39) for third generation users.
Subgroup analysis by progestagen content did not show any significant
difference from 1, and there was no effect of duration of use. The
adjusted odds ratio for third generation users versus second generation users was 1.78 (0.66 to 4.83). 87% of cases were not exposed to an
oral contraceptive, and 88% had clinical cardiovascular risk factors
or were smokers, or both. Smoking was strongly associated with
myocardial infarction: adjusted odds ratio 12.5 (7.29 to 21.5) for
smoking 20 or more cigarettes a day.
Conclusions:
There was no significant association
between the use of oral contraceptives and myocardial infarction. The modest and non-significant point estimates for this association have
wide confidence intervals. There was no significant difference between
second and third generation products.
Key message
Read all Rapid Responses