Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Linda Irvine a Department of Child Health, Ninewells Hospital and
Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, b Department of Epidemiology
and Public Health, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, c Department of Medicine, Ninewells
Hospital and Medical School, d Wallacetown Health Centre, Dundee DD4 6RB, e Nicotine Laboratory,
Wardalls Grove, London SE14 5ER
Correspondence to: L Irvine
lirvine{at}eph.dundee.ac.uk
Objective:
To investigate whether parents of
asthmatic children would stop smoking or alter their smoking habits to
protect their children from environmental tobacco smoke.
Design:
Randomised controlled trial.
Setting:
Tayside and Fife, Scotland.
Participants:
501 families with an asthmatic child
aged 2-12 years living with a parent who smoked.
Intervention:
Parents were told about the impact of
passive smoking on asthma and were advised to stop smoking or change
their smoking habits to protect their child's health.
Main outcome measures:
Salivary cotinine
concentrations in children, and changes in reported smoking habits of
the parents 1 year after the intervention.
Results:
At the second visit, about 1 year after the baseline visit, a small decrease in salivary cotinine concentrations was found in both groups of children: the mean decrease in the intervention group (0.70 ng/ml) was slightly smaller than that of the
control group (0.88 ng/ml), but the net difference of 0.19 ng/ml had a
wide 95% confidence interval (
0.86 to 0.48). Overall, 98% of
parents in both groups still smoked at follow up. However, there was a
non-significant tendency for parents in the intervention group to
report smoking more at follow up and to having a reduced desire to stop smoking.
Conclusions:
A brief intervention to advise parents
of asthmatic children about the risks from passive smoking was
ineffective in reducing their children's exposure to environmental
tobacco smoke. The intervention may have made some parents less
inclined to stop smoking. If a clinician believes that a child's
health is being affected by parental smoking, the parent's smoking
needs to be addressed as a separate issue from the child's health.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses