Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Four papers appear in the print BMJ this week in abridged form. The full and abridged versions are both available here on our website. The editorial by Delamothe et al explains why we are doing this, and we welcome readers' reactions. The paper by Whitehead (p. 908) appears in two abridged versions, one much shorter than the other; again we welcome readers' reactions on which they prefer, and why.
Mary Bredin a Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care Studies,
Macmillan Practice Development Unit, Institute of Cancer Research,
Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, b Centre for Cancer and
Palliative Care Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, c Department of
Computing and Information, Royal Marsden NHS Trust
Correspondence to: Jessica
Corner jessica{at}icr.ac.uk
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of nursing
intervention for breathlessness in patients with lung cancer.
Design:
Patients diagnosed with lung cancer
participated in a multicentre randomised controlled trial where they
either attended a nursing clinic offering intervention for their
breathlessness or received best supportive care. The intervention
consisted of a range of strategies combining breathing control,
activity pacing, relaxation techniques, and psychosocial support. Best
supportive care involved receiving standard management and treatment
available for breathlessness, and breathing assessments. Participants
completed a range of self assessment questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks.
Setting:
Nursing clinics within 6 hospital settings in
the United Kingdom.
Participants:
119 patients diagnosed with small cell
or non-small cell lung cancer or with mesothelioma who had completed first line treatment for their disease and reported breathlessness.
Outcome measures:
Visual analogue scales
measuring distress due to breathlessness, breathlessness at best and
worst, WHO performance status scale, hospital anxiety and depression
scale, and Rotterdam symptom checklist.
Results:
The intervention group improved significantly at 8 weeks in 5 of the 11 items assessed: breathlessness at best, WHO
performance status, levels of depression, and two Rotterdam symptom
checklist measures (physical symptom distress and breathlessness) and
showed slight improvement in 3 of the remaining 6 items.
Conclusion:
Most patients who completed the study had a poor prognosis, and breathlessness was typically a symptom of their
deteriorating condition. Patients who attended nursing clinics and
received the breathlessness intervention experienced improvements in
breathlessness, performance status, and physical and emotional states
relative to control patients.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses