BMJ 1999;318:837-841 ( 27 March )

Papers

Systematic review of day hospital care for elderly people

Anne Forster, research physiotherapista John Young, consultant physiciana Peter Langhorne, senior lecturerb on behalf of the Day Hospital Group.

a Department of Health Care for the Elderly, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford BD5 0NA, b Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF

Correspondence to: Dr Forster a.forster{at}leeds.ac.uk

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of day hospital attendance in prolonging independent living for elderly people.
Design: Systematic review of 12 controlled clinical trials (available by January 1997) comparing day hospital care with comprehensive care (five trials), domiciliary care (four trials), or no comprehensive care (three trials).
Subjects: 2867 elderly people.
Main outcome measures: Death, institutionalisation, disability, global "poor outcome," and use of resources.
Results: Overall, there was no significant difference between day hospitals and alternative services for death, disability, or use of resources. However, compared with subjects receiving no comprehensive care, patients attending day hospitals had a lower odds of death or "poor" outcome (0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to 0.99; P<0.05) and functional deterioration (0.61, 0.38 to 0.97; P<0.05). The day hospital group showed trends towards reductions in hospital bed use and placement in institutional care. Eight trials reported treatment costs, six of which reported that day hospital attendance was more expensive than other care, although only two analyses took into account cost of long term care.
Conclusions: Day hospital care seems to be an effective service for elderly people who need rehabilitation but may have no clear advantage over other comprehensive care. Methodological problems limit these conclusions, and further randomised trials are justifiable.


Key messages

  • The benefits of geriatric day hospital care have been controversial for many years

  • This systematic review of 12 randomised trials comparing a variety of day hospitals with a range of alternative services found no overall advantage for day hospital care

  • Day hospitals had a possible advantage over no comprehensive care in terms of death or poor outcome, disability, and use of resources

  • The costs of day hospital care may be partly offset by a reduced use of hospital beds and institutional care among survivors





© BMJ 1999

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

More things not to do
BMJ 1999 318: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Day hospitals are no better than other comprehensive elderly care
BMJ 1999 318: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Piccoliori, G., Gerolimon, E., Abholz, H.-H. (2008). Geriatric assessment in general practice using a screening instrument: is it worth the effort? Results of a South Tyrol Study. Age Ageing 37: 647-652 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Crotty, M., Giles, L. C., Halbert, J., Harding, J., Miller, M. (2008). Home versus day rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 37: 628-633 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bolton, L. B., Donaldson, N. E., Rutledge, D. N., Bennett, C., Brown, D. S. (2007). The Impact of Nursing Interventions: Overview of Effective Interventions, Outcomes, Measures, and Priorities for Future Research. Med Care Res Rev 64: 123S-143S [Abstract]  
  • Wilson, D. M., Truman, C. D. (2004). Evaluating Institutionalization by Comparing the Use of Health Services before and after Admission to a Long-Term-Care Facility. Eval Health Prof 27: 219-236 [Abstract]  
  • Ingleton, C, Payne, S, Nolan, M, Carey, I (2003). Respite in palliative care: a review and discussion of the literature. Palliat Med 17: 567-575 [Abstract]  
  • Hershkovitz, A., Gottlieb, D., Beloosesky, Y., Brill, S. (2003). Programme evaluation of a geriatric rehabilitation day hospital. Clin Rehabil 17: 750-755 [Abstract]  
  • Powell, J, Roberts, H (2002). Identifying 'value' in day care provision for older people. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 122: 158-164 [Abstract]  
  • Richardson, J., Law, M., Wishart, L., Guyatt, G. (2000). The Use of a Simulated Environment (Easy Street) to Retrain Independent Living Skills in Elderly Persons: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 55: 578M-584 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Higginson, I J, Hearn, J, Myers, K, Naysmith, A (2000). Palliative day care: what do services do?. Palliat Med 14: 277-286 [Abstract]  
  • Harwood, R. H, Ebrahim, S. (2000). Measuring the outcomes of day hospital attendance: a comparison of the Barthel Index and London Handicap Scale. Clin Rehabil 14: 527-531 [Abstract]  
  • Burch, S., Longbottom, J., McKay, M., Borland, C., Prevost, T. (2000). The Huntingdon Day Hospital Trial: secondary outcome measures. Clin Rehabil 14: 447-453 [Abstract]  
  • (1999). Other Articles Noted. Evid. Based Nurs. 2: 105-112 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Effects of interventions may not be reflected in outcome measure
R W Fowler
bmj.com, 3 Jun 1999 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ