Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Anne Forster a Department of Health Care for the
Elderly, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford BD5 0NA, b Academic Section of Geriatric
Medicine, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF
Correspondence to: Dr Forster
a.forster{at}leeds.ac.uk
Objective:
To examine the effectiveness of day
hospital attendance in prolonging independent living for elderly people.
Design:
Systematic review of 12 controlled clinical trials (available by January 1997) comparing day hospital care with
comprehensive care (five trials), domiciliary care (four trials), or no
comprehensive care (three trials).
Subjects:
2867 elderly people.
Main outcome measures:
Death, institutionalisation,
disability, global "poor outcome," and use of resources.
Results:
Overall, there was no significant difference between day hospitals and alternative services for death, disability, or use of resources. However, compared with subjects receiving no
comprehensive care, patients attending day hospitals had a lower odds
of death or "poor" outcome (0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.53 to
0.99; P<0.05) and functional deterioration (0.61, 0.38 to 0.97;
P<0.05). The day hospital group showed trends towards reductions in
hospital bed use and placement in institutional care. Eight trials
reported treatment costs, six of which reported that day hospital
attendance was more expensive than other care, although only two
analyses took into account cost of long term care.
Conclusions:
Day hospital care seems to be an
effective service for elderly people who need rehabilitation but may
have no clear advantage over other comprehensive care. Methodological problems limit these conclusions, and further randomised trials are justifiable.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses