Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Michael Rösler a Sektion Gerontopsychiatric, Psychiatrische
Universitätsklinik, Fuchsleinstrasse 15, D 97080 Würzburg, Germany, b CNS Clinical Research,
Novartis Pharmaceuticals, 59 Route 10, East Hanover, NJ 07936, USA, c Novartis Pharma, Lichstrasse 35, 4002 Basel, Switzerland, d McGill Centre for Studies on Aging, 6825 LaSalle Blvd, Verdun, Quebec H4H 1R3, Canada, e Department of Neurology,
Fédération de Neurologie and INSERM U 289, Hôpital Pitié
Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France, f Universitätsklinik für Neurologie,
Wahringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria, g Geriatrische
Universitätsklinik, Kantonsspital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence to: Professor Rösler roesler{at}rzbox.uni-wuerzburg.de
Objectives:
To assess the effects of rivastigmine on
the core domains of Alzheimer's disease.
Design:
Prospective, randomised, multicentre, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group trial. Patients received either placebo, 1-4 mg/day (lower dose) rivastigmine, or 6-12 mg/day
(higher dose) rivastigmine. Doses were increased in one of two fixed
dose ranges (1-4 mg/day or 6-12 mg/day) over the first 12 weeks with a
subsequent assessment period of 14 weeks.
Setting:
45 centres in Europe and North America.
Participants:
725 patients with mild to moderately
severe probable Alzheimer's disease diagnosed according to the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders,
fourth edition, and the criteria of the National Institute of
Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the
Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association.
Outcome measures:
Cognitive subscale of the
Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, rating on the clinician
interview based impression of change incorporating caregiver
information scale, and the progressive deterioration scale.
Results:
At the end of the study cognitive function had deteriorated among those in the placebo group. Scores on the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale improved in patients in the higher dose group when compared with patients taking placebo (P<0.05). Significantly more patients in the higher dose group had improved by 4 points or more than had improved in the placebo group (24% (57/242)
v 16% (39/238)). Global function as rated by the clinician interview scale had significantly improved among those in the higher
dose group compared with those taking placebo (P<0.001), and
significantly more patients in the higher dose group showed improvement
than did in the placebo group (37% (80/219) v 20% (46/230)). Mean scores on the progressive deterioration scale improved
from baseline in patients in the higher dose group but fell in the
placebo group. Adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal, of
mild to moderate severity, transient, and occurred mainly during escalation of the dose. 23% (55/242) of those in the higher dose group, 7% (18/242) of those in the lower dose group, and 7% (16/239) of those in the placebo group discontinued treatment because of adverse events.
Conclusions:
Rivastigmine is well tolerated and
effective. It improves cognition, participation in activities of daily
living, and global evaluation ratings in patients with mild to
moderately severe Alzheimer's disease. This is the first treatment to
show compelling evidence of efficacy in a predominantly European population.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+