Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
David Kessler a Institute of General Practice, Postgraduate Medical
School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, b Department of Mental
Health, University of Exeter, Wonford House Hospital, Exeter EX2 5AF, c Division of
Psychological Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine,
Cardiff CF4 4XN
Correspondence to: Dr Kessler
Gaywood House Surgery, North Street, Bristol BS3 3AZ
DavidKessler1{at}compuserve.com
Objectives:
To examine the effect of patients' causal attributions of common somatic symptoms on recognition by general practitioners of cases of depression and anxiety and to test the hypothesis that normalising attributions make recognition less likely.
Design:
Cross sectional survey.
Setting:
One general practice of eight doctors in Bristol.
Subjects:
305 general practice attenders.
Main outcome measure:
The rate of detection by general
practitioners of cases of depression and anxiety as defined by the
general health questionnaire.
Results:
Consecutive attenders completed the general health questionnaire and the symptom interpretation questionnaire, which scores style of symptom attribution along the dimensions of
psychologising, somatising, and normalising. General practitioners detected depression or anxiety in 56 (36%; 95% confidence interval 28% to 44%) of the 157 patients who scored highly on the general health questionnaire. Subjects with a normalising attributional style
were less likely to be detected as cases; doctors did not make any
psychological diagnosis in 46 (85%; 73% to 93%) of 54 patients who
had high questionnaire and high normalising scores. Those with a
psychologising style were more likely to be detected; doctors did not
detect 21 (38%; 25% to 52%) of 55 patients who had high
questionnaire and high psychologising scores. The somatisation scale
was not associated with low detection rates. This pattern of results
persisted after adjustment for age, sex, general health questionnaire
score, and general practitioner.
Conclusions:
Normalising attributions minimise
symptoms and are non-pathological in character. The normalising
attributional style is predominant in general practice attenders and is
an important cause of low rates of detection of depression and anxiety.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses