Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Peter Salmon a Department of Clinical Psychology, University of
Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB, b Department
of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GB
Correspondence to:
Professor Stanley
Objectives:
To describe, from the perspective
of patients, distinguishing features of doctors' attempts to explain
the symptoms of somatisation disorders.
Design:
Qualitative analysis of verbatim
records of interviews in which patients recounted doctors'
explanations of their symptoms.
Setting:
Patients with persistent somatising
symptoms referred from general practices in Liverpool and St Helens and Knowsley were interviewed before entry into a treatment programme.
Subjects:
228 of 324 patients referred were
interviewed. Initial interviews were used to develop the process and
technique, and the final analysis was based on a subsample of 68 records, randomly chosen from the transcripts of 188 subjects who were interviewed subsequently.
Results:
Doctors' explanations were often at odds
with the patients' own thinking. Analysis showed that medical
explanations could be grouped into one of three categories, defined by
the patients' perceptions. Most explanations were experienced as
rejecting the reality of the symptoms. An intermediate category
comprised explanations that were viewed as colluding, in which the
doctor acquiesced with the patients' own biomedical theories. However, a few explanations were perceived by patients as tangible, exculpating, and involving. These explanations were experienced by patients as
satisfying and empowering.
Conclusions:
Patients with somatisation
disorders feel satisfied and empowered by medical explanations that are
tangible, exculpating, and involving. Empowering explanations could
improve these patients' wellbeing and help to reduce the high demands they make on health services.
Key messages
rejecting, colluding, and empowering
Read all Rapid Responses