Papers

Withdrawing low risk women from cervical screening programmes: mathematical modelling study

C Sherlaw-Johnson, senior research fellow, ^a S Gallivan, professor of operational research, ^a D Jenkins, reader in pathology. ^b

^a Clinical Operational Research Unit, Department of Mathematics, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, ^b Division of Pathology, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH

Correspondence to: Dr Sherlaw-Johnson c.sherlaw-johnson{at}ucl.ac.uk

Objective: To evaluate the impact of policies for removing women before the recommended age of 64 from screening programmes for cervical cancer in the United Kingdom.
Design: A mathematical model of the clinical course of precancerous lesions which accounts for the influence of infection with the human papillomavirus, the effects of screening on the progression of disease, and the accuracy of the testing procedures. Two policies are compared: one in which women are withdrawn from the programme if their current smear is negative and they have a recent history of regular, negative results and one in which women are withdrawn if their current smear test is negative and a simultaneous test is negative for exposure to high risk types of human papillomavirus.
Setting: United Kingdom cervical screening programme.
Main outcome measures: The incidence of invasive cervical cancer and the use of resources.
Results: Early withdrawal of selected women from the programme is predicted to give rise to resource savings of up to 25% for smear tests and 18% for colposcopies when withdrawal occurs from age 50, the youngest age considered in the study. An increase in the incidence of invasive cervical cancer, by up to 2 cases/100 000 women each year is predicted. Testing for human papillomavirus infection to determine which women should be withdrawn from the programme makes little difference to outcome.
Conclusions: This model systematically analyses the consequences of screening options using available data and the clinical course of precancerous lesions. If further audit studies confirm the model's forecasts, a policy of early withdrawal might be considered. This would be likely to release substantial resources which could be channelled into other aspects of health care or may be more effectively used within the cervical screening programme to counteract the possible increase in cancer incidence that early withdrawal might bring.