Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
P A Kalra a Department of Renal Medicine, Hope Hospital,
Salford M6 8HD, b Department
of Renal Medicine, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl LL18 5UJ, c National Primary Care Research and Development Centre,
University of Manchester, Manchester
Correspondence to: Dr Kalra
phil{at}ren.srht.nwest.nhs.uk
Objectives:
To determine the current pattern of use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and monitoring of renal function in general practice and to audit all admissions to a regional
renal unit for uraemia related to use of these drugs.
Design:
Postal questionnaire sent to 400 general
practitioners; audit of clinical notes of all patients receiving these
drugs in one large general practice; audit of all cases of uraemia
(creatinine concentration >500 µmol/l) related to treatment
presenting to hospital renal services over 12 months.
Setting:
General practices in the North Wales health authority and one in central Manchester. Regional renal unit in Salford.
Main outcome measures:
Proportion of general
practitioners who regularly monitored renal function before and after
initiation of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Indications for
treatment and details of monitoring of renal function in patients
receiving these drugs. Incidence of related uraemia and evidence of
comorbid disease, other aetiological factors, delayed detection, and
patient outcome.
Results:
277 (69%) general practitioners replied; 235 (85%) checked renal function before but only 93 (34%) after the start
of treatment, and 42 (15%) never checked renal function. Angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed for 162 patients from a
total of 3625 aged >35 years (mean age 66.4 (SD 15.9) years).
Monitoring of renal function occurred before treatment in 55 (45%) and
after start of treatment in 35 (29%) of the 122 patients treated in
general practice. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors could be
causally implicated in 9 (7%) of 135 admissions for uraemia (mean age
74.2 (7.2) v 62.1 (2.1) years; P<0.01). 3 patients had
renovascular disease and 6 had congestive cardiac failure with another
intercurrent illness. Renal function had not been checked in any
patient after the start of treatment; mean duration of illness before
admission was 10.5 (3.2) days. Mean length of hospital stay was 20.9 (10.4) days; there were 8 survivors.
Conclusion:
Cases of uraemia related to
treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are still
encountered and are often detected late because of lack of judicious
monitoring of renal function in vulnerable, often elderly, patients,
especially at times of intercurrent illness. Guidelines for appropriate
monitoring of renal function may help to minimise the problem.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses