Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
B J Britton a John Radcliffe Hospital,
Oxford OX3 9DU, b Department of Clinical Geratology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford
OX2 6HE, c Wadham
College, Oxford OX1 3PN
Correspondence to: Professor Grimley
Evans john.grimleyevans{at}geratology.oxford.ac.uk
Objective:
To investigate the importance of the type of dry fly (artificial floating fly) in catching trout (brown and
rainbow) in an English chalkstream.
Setting:
River Kennet, Berkshire.
Design:
Five anglers on five separate occasions spent five hours using a randomly allocated fly from a sample of five types.
Participants:
Five anglers of considerable but varying
experience, determination, and opinion.
Main outcome measures:
Number, weight, and species of
trout caught.
Results:
One fly (Black Gnat) performed significantly worse than the others. The fly most successful in catching brown trout
was the Cinnamon Sedge.
Conclusion:
The possible prolongation of doctors'
leisure time consequent on the use of unproductive trout flies has
resource implications for the NHS. Urgent funding of a definitive,
large multiriver trial is needed.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses