Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
B D Pethica a Wellington Asthma Research Group, Wellington
School of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand, b Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners Research
Unit, Department of General Practice, Dunedin School of Medicine,
University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand
Correspondence to: Dr
Pethica WARG.Sec{at}wnmeds.ac.nz
Objective To determine whether inhaled budesonide and
beclomethasone are equipotent in the treatment of asthma in primary
care.
Design Retrospective study of computerised clinical
records from 28 general practices in New Zealand.
Subjects 5930 patients who received 16 725
prescriptions for inhaled budesonide or beclomethasone from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1995.
Setting General practices on the database of the
Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners Research Unit. Linked information from secondary care was available for a subset of
the practices.
Main outcome measure Mean prescribed daily inhaled
corticosteroid dose.
Results The daily prescribed dose was higher for
patients receiving inhaled budesonide (mean 979 µg) than
beclomethasone (mean 635 µg), a difference of 344 µg (95%
confidence interval 313 to 376 µg). This difference was consistent in
all age bands and with different types of inhalation device. Evidence
of systematic prescribing of higher doses of budesonide to patients
with more severe asthma was not found.
Conclusions In primary care in New Zealand evidence
suggests that budesonide is less potent than beclomethasone.
Consideration of validated, established, and other possible markers of
asthma severity did not support confounding by severity as a reason for the higher prescribed doses of budesonide. Pending further
epidemiological evaluation, international asthma guidelines may need to
be modified on the equivalence of inhaled corticosteroid doses.
Furthermore, the comparative potency of newly developed inhaled
steroids in clinical trials will need to be confirmed in appropriately
designed epidemiological studies based in general
practice.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses