Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Christopher C Butler a Department of General
Practice, University of Wales College of Medicine, Llanedeyrn Health
Centre, Maelfa, Cardiff CF3 7PN, b Department of Dental Public Health, University of
Wales College of Medicine, Lansdowne Hospital, Cardiff
Correspondence to: Dr Rollnick genpract{at}cf.ac.uk
Objectives: To better understand reasons for
antibiotics being prescribed for sore throats despite well known
evidence that they are generally of little help.
Design: Qualitative study with semi-structured
interviews.
Setting: General practices in South Wales.
Subjects: 21 general practitioners and 17 of their
patients who had recently consulted for a sore throat or upper
respiratory tract infection.
Main outcome measures: Subjects' experience of
management of the illness, patients' expectations, beliefs about
antibiotic treatment for sore throats, and ideas for reducing
prescribing.
Results: Doctors knew of the evidence for marginal
effectiveness yet often prescribed for good relationships with
patients. Possible patient benefit outweighed theoretical community
risk from resistant bacteria. Most doctors found prescribing "against the evidence" uncomfortable and realised this probably increased workload. Explanations of the distinction between virus and bacterium often led to perceived confusion. Clinicians were divided on the value
of leaflets and national campaigns, but several favoured patient
empowerment for self care by other members of the primary care team.
Patient expectations were seldom made explicit, and many were not met.
A third of patients had a clear expectation for antibiotics, and
mothers were more likely to accept non-antibiotic treatment for their
children than for themselves. Satisfaction was not necessarily related
to receiving antibiotics, with many seeking reassurance, further
information, and pain relief.
Conclusions: This prescribing decision is greatly
influenced by considerations of the doctor-patient relationship. Consulting strategies that make patient expectations explicit without
damaging relationships might reduce unwanted antibiotics. Repeating
evidence for lack of effectiveness is unlikely to change doctors'
prescribing, but information about risk to individual patients might.
Emphasising positive aspects of non-antibiotic treatment and lack of
efficacy in general might be helpful.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses