Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jan Potter a Victoria Geriatric Unit, Victoria Infirmary NHS
Trust, Glasgow G41 3DX, b Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, Department of
Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary Trust, Glasgow
G4 0SF
Correspondence to: Dr J Potter, Department of Medicine for the
Elderly, Mansionhouse Unit, Victoria Infirmary NHS Trust, Glasgow G41
3DX
Objectives: To determine whether routine oral and
enteral nutritional supplementation can improve the weight,
anthropometry, and survival of adult patients.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled
trials of oral or enteral protein supplementation in adults. Trials were identified from Medline (Silver Platter 3.11, 1966-96), reference lists of identified studies and review articles, and communication with
feed manufacturers.
Subjects: Randomised controlled trials comparing oral
or enteral protein supplementation with no routine supplementation. All
trials of adult subjects were included except those addressing nutrition in pregnancy.
Main outcome measures: Change in body weight and
anthropometry (mid-arm muscle circumference), and all cause case
fatality recorded at the end of scheduled follow up. Body weight and
anthropometry were analysed as the weighted mean difference and 95%
confidence intervals of the percentage change in these variables. Case
fatality was analysed with odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: 32 eligible reports (2286 randomised
patients) published between February 1979 and July 1996 were
identified, of which 30 (93.8%) (2062 randomised patients) reported
outcomes of interest. Case fatality data were available for 1670 (81%) patients, and continuous variable data for up to 1607 (78%) patients. The treatment group receiving routine nutritional supplementation showed consistently improved changes in body weight and anthropometry compared with controls; weighted mean difference 2.06% (95%
confidence interval 1.63% to 2.49%) and 3.16% (2.43% to 3.89%)
respectively. The pooled odds ratio for death in the treatment group
was 0.66 (0.48 to 0.91, 2P<0.01). Apparent benefits were observed in
several prespecified subgroups of patients, treatment settings, and
interventions, but were not evident if trials with less robust
methodology were excluded.
Conclusions: Routine oral or enteral supplementation
seems to improve the nutritional indices of adult patients, but there
are insufficient data in trials which meet strict methodological criteria to be certain if mortality is reduced. Benefits were not
restricted to particular patient groups. Further large pragmatic randomised controlled trials of routine nutritional supplementation are
justified.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses