Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Keith Hawton a Department of Psychiatry, Oxford
University, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, b Psychological Medicine, Nepean
Hospital, PO Box 63, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia, c Department of Psychological Medicine, John
Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, d Department of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia, e Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol,
Bristol BS8 2PR, f Discipline of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine
and Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia, g Department of Psychiatry, University
Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium, h Division of
Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, School of Medicine, University of
Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LT, i Clarke Institute of Psychiatry, Toronto,
Canada MST IR8, j Department of Psychiatry, University
Hospital, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
Correspondence
to: Professor Hawton Keith.Hawton{at}psychiatry.ox.ac.uk
Objective: To identify and synthesise the findings
from all randomised controlled trials that have examined the
effectiveness of treatments of patients who have deliberately harmed
themselves.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled
trials of psychosocial and physical treatments. Studies categorised according to type of treatment. When there was more than one
investigation in a particular category a summary odds ratio was
estimated with the Mantel-Haenszel method.
Setting: Randomised trials available in electronic
databases in 1996, in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register in 1997, and from hand searching of journals to 1997.
Subjects: Patients who had deliberately harmed
themselves shortly before entry into the trials with information on repetition of behaviour. The included trials comprised 2452 randomised participants with outcome data.
Main outcome measure: Repetition of self harm.
Results: 20 trials reported repetition of self
harm as an outcome variable, classified into 10 categories. Summary odds ratio (all for comparison with standard aftercare) indicated reduced repetition for problem solving therapy (0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 1.18) and for provision of an emergency contact card
in addition to standard care (0.45; 0.19 to 1.07). The summary odds
ratios were 0.83 (0.61 to 1.14) for trials of intensive aftercare plus
outreach and 1.19 (0.53 to 2.67) for antidepressant treatment compared
with placebo. Significantly reduced rates of further self harm were
observed for depot flupenthixol versus placebo in multiple repeaters
(0.09; 0.02 to 0.50) and for dialectical behaviour therapy versus
standard aftercare (0.24; 0.06 to 0.93).
Conclusion: There remains considerable
uncertainty about which forms of psychosocial and physical treatments
of patients who harm themselves are most effective. Further larger
trials of treatments are needed.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses