BMJ 1998;317:103-110 ( 11 July )

Papers

Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost

James Wellwood, consultant surgeona Mark J Sculpher, research fellowb David Stoker, consultant surgeonc Graham J Nicholls, research fellowd Cathy Geddes, research nursea Anne Whitehead, deputy directord Rameet Singh, associate anaesthetic specialista David Spiegelhalter, senior statisticiane

a Whipps Cross Hospital, London E11 1NR, b Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, c North Middlesex Hospital, London N18 1QX, d Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, University of Reading, PO Box 240, Reading RG6 6FN, e MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR

Correspondence to: Mr Wellwood

Objective: To compare tension-free open mesh hernioplasty under local anaesthetic with transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair under general anaesthetic.
Design: A randomised controlled trial of 403 patients with inguinal hernias.
Setting: Two acute general hospitals in London between May 1995 and December 1996. 
Subjects: 400 patients with a diagnosis of groin hernia, 200 in each group.
Main outcome measures: Time until discharge, postoperative pain, and complications; patients' perceived health (SF-36), duration of convalescence, and patients' satisfaction with surgery; and health service costs.
Results: More patients in the open group (96%) than in the laparoscopic group (89%) were discharged on the same day as the operation (chi 2=6.7; 1 df; P=0.01). Although pain scores were lower in the open group while the effect of the local anaesthetic persisted (proportional odds ratio at 2 hours 3.5 (2.3 to 5.1)), scores after open repair were significantly higher for each day of the first week (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) on day 7) and during the second week (0.7 (0.5 to 0.9)). At 1 month there was a greater improvement (or less deterioration) in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group on seven of eight dimensions, reaching significance on five. For every activity considered the median time until return to normal was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group. Patients randomised to laparoscopic repair were more satisfied with surgery at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The mean cost per patient of laparoscopic repair was £335 (95% confidence interval £228 to £441) more than the cost of open repair.
Conclusion: This study confirms that laparoscopic hernia repair has considerable short term clinical advantages after discharge compared with open mesh hernioplasty, although it was more expensive.

Key messages

  • In the 4 hours after surgery laparoscopic hernia repair with general anaesthesia causes more pain than open repair with local anaesthesia (mainly because of the anaesthesia used) and necessitates longer stay in hospital. Laparoscopic hernia repair, however, causes less pain than open hernia repair during the first 2 weeks after discharge

  • Laparoscopic hernia repair results in fewer episodes of wound infection, persistent local pain, genital swelling, numbness, and constipation than open repair. Urinary disturbances are more common after laparoscopic than after open repair

  • Patients' perception of health 1 month after the operation (assessed with the SF-36) and satisfaction with treatment is superior for laparoscopic patients who also have a shorter period of convalescence after surgery

  • The health service cost of day case laparoscopic repair is £335 more than the cost of open mesh hernioplasty performed on a day case basis




© BMJ 1998

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia
James Wellwood, Mark Sculpher, and David Stoker
BMJ 1999 318: 1214. [Extract] [Full Text]

Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia
M J Notaras, Keith Rose, David Wright, Charles McCollum, A E Kark, M N Kurzer, P A Belsham, R S Taylor, A Naseef, E Brandt, S Jacob, Ani Anyanwu, Dermot O'Riordan, D P Kernick, Deborah Reinhold, and A G Johnson
BMJ 1999 318: 189. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Cost and quality
BMJ 1998 317: 0. [Full Text]

Recovery is quicker after laparoscopic hernia repair---but there is a cost
BMJ 1998 317: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Suvikapakornkul, R., Valaivarangkul, P., Noiwan, P., Phansukphon, T. (2009). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preperitoneal Bupivacaine Instillation for Reducing Pain Following Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorrhaphy. SURG INNOV 16: 117-123 [Abstract]  
  • Aasvang, E. K., Hansen, J. B., Malmstrom, J., Asmussen, T., Gennevois, D., Struys, M. M. R. F., Kehlet, H. (2008). The Effect of Wound Instillation of a Novel Purified Capsaicin Formulation on Postherniotomy Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Anesth. Analg. 107: 282-291 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • O'Dwyer, P. J. (2004). Current status of the debate on laparoscopic hernia repair. Br Med Bull 70: 105-118 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Fujita, F., Lahmann, B., Otsuka, K., Lyass, S., Hiatt, J. R., Phillips, E. H. (2004). Quantification of Pain and Satisfaction Following Laparoscopic and Open Hernia Repair. Arch Surg 139: 596-600 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kluin, J., den Hoed, P. T., van Linschoten, R., IJzerman, J. C., van Steensel, C. J. (2004). Endoscopic Evaluation and Treatment of Groin Pain in the Athlete. Am J Sports Med 32: 944-949 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Douek, M, Smith, G, Oshowo, A, Stoker, D L, Wellwood, J M (2003). Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: five year follow up. BMJ 326: 1012-1013 [Full text]  
  • Pesanelli, K. E, Cigna, J. A, Basu, S. G, Morin, A. R (2003). Occupational Rehabilitation Following Open Mesh Surgical Repair of an Inguinal Hernia. ptjournal 83: 58-66 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Motson, R. W (2002). Why does NICE not recommend laparoscopic herniorraphy?. BMJ 324: 1092-1094 [Full text]  
  • Callesen, T., Bech, K., Kehlet, H. (2001). One-Thousand Consecutive Inguinal Hernia Repairs Under Unmonitored Local Anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 93: 1373-1376 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Mokete, M, Earnshaw, J J (2001). Evolution of an inguinal hernia surgery practice. Postgrad. Med. J. 77: 188-190 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Southern Surgeons' Club Study Group, (1999). Handoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Trial of a Minimally Invasive Technique for Complex Abdominal Surgery. Arch Surg 134: 477-485 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wellwood, J., Sculpher, M., Stoker, D. (1999). Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. BMJ 318: 1214a-1214 [Full text]  
  • Notaras, M J, Rose, K., Wright, D., McCollum, C., Kark, A E, Kurzer, M N, Belsham, P A, Taylor, R S, Naseef, A, Brandt, E, Jacob, S, Anyanwu, A., O'Riordan, D., Kernick, D P, Reinhold, D., Johnson, A G (1999). Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair of inguinal hernia. BMJ 318: 189-189 [Full text]  
  • (1998). Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: Quick Fix at a Price. Journal Watch Dermatology 1998: 17-17 [Full text]  
  • (1998). Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: Quick Fix at a Price. JWatch General 1998: 5-5 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Untitled
Ani Anyanwu
bmj.com, 27 Jul 1998 [Full text]
The difference in cost matters
A G Johnson
bmj.com, 20 Aug 1998 [Full text]
The Cut or the Keyhole?
M J Notaras
bmj.com, 27 Aug 1998 [Full text]
Ready for laparoscopic hernia repair
Juan Marin
bmj.com, 1 Sep 1998 [Full text]
CONCLUSIONS FROM LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIA REPAIR SHOULD BE SUPPORTED WITH MORE SIGNIFICANT RESULTS
Guzman Franch-Arcas
bmj.com, 4 Jan 1999 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ