Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Frank W J M Smeenk a Departments of Multidisciplinary
Oncology and Pulmonology, Catharina Hospital, PO Box 1350, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, Netherlands, b Institute for Rehabilitation Research
(IRV), PO Box 192, 6430 AD Hoensbroek, Netherlands, c Health Care
Interventions and Services Department, Institute for Rehabilitation
Research (IRV), PO Box 192, 6430 AD Hoensbroek, d Department of General Practice,
Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
Correspondence to: Dr Smeenk fsk{at}iaehv.nl
Objective: To investigate whether for
patients with incurable cancer comprehensive home care programmes are
more effective than standard care in maintaining the patients' quality
of life and reducing their "readmission time" (percentage of days
spent in hospital from start of care till death).
Design: Systematic review.
Methods: A computer aided search was
conducted using the databases of Medline, Embase, CancerLit, and
PsychLit. The search for studies and the assessment of the
methodological quality of the relevant studies were performed by two
investigators, blinded from each other. Prospective, controlled studies
investigating the effects of a home care intervention programme on
patients' quality of life or on readmission time were included in the
analyses.
Results: Only 9 prospective controlled studies were
found; eight were performed in the United States and 1 in the United
Kingdom. Their methodological quality was judged to be moderate (median
rating 62 on a 100 point scale). None of the studies showed a negative
influence of home care interventions on quality of life. A
significantly positive influence on the outcome measures was seen in 2 out of the 5 studies measuring patients' satisfaction with care, in
3/7 studies measuring physical dimensions of quality of life, in 1/6
studies measuring psychosocial dimensions, and in 2/5 studies measuring
readmission time. The incorporation of team members' visits to
patients at home or regular multidisciplinary team meetings into the
intervention programme seemed to be related to positive results.
Conclusions: The effectiveness of comprehensive home
care programmes remains unclear. Given the enormity of the problems
faced by society in caring for patients with terminal cancer, further
research is urgently needed.
Key messages