Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Gareth J Parry a Medical Care Research Unit, School of Health and
Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7XL, b Sheffield Health Economics Group, School of Health
and Related Research, c Department of Child Health, Ninewells
Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY
Correspondence to: Mr Parry
g.parry{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Objective: To assess whether crude league tables of
mortality and league tables of risk adjusted mortality accurately
reflect the performance of hospitals.
Design: Longitudinal study of mortality occurring in
hospital.
Setting: 9 neonatal intensive care units in the
United Kingdom.
Subjects: 2671 very low birth weight or preterm
infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units between 1988 and
1994.
Main outcome measures: Crude hospital mortality and
hospital mortality adjusted using the clinical risk index for babies
(CRIB) score.
Results: Hospitals had wide and overlapping
confidence intervals when ranked by mortality in annual league tables;
this made it impossible to discriminate between hospitals reliably. In
most years there was no significant difference between hospitals, only
random variation. The apparent performance of individual hospitals
fluctuated substantially from year to year.
Conclusions: Annual league tables are not reliable
indicators of performance or best practice; they do not reflect
consistent differences between hospitals. Any action prompted by the
annual league tables would have been equally likely to have been
beneficial, detrimental, or irrelevant. Mortality should be compared
between groups of hospitals using specific criteria
such as
differences in the volume of patients, staffing policy, training of
staff, or aspects of clinical practice
after adjusting for risk. This
will produce more reliable estimates with narrower confidence
intervals, and more reliable and rapid conclusions.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses