Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Christopher C Butler Department of General Practice, University of
Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff CF3 7PN
Correspondence to:
Dr Butler butlercc{at}cf.ac.uk
Objectives: To determine the effectiveness and
acceptability of general practitioners'opportunistic antismoking
interventions by examining detailed accounts of smokers' experiences
of these.
Design: Qualitative semistructured interview study.
Setting: South Wales.
Subjects: 42 participants in the Welsh smoking
intervention study were asked about initial smoking, attempts to quit,
thoughts about future smoking, past experiences with the health
services, and the most appropriate way for health services to help them
and other smokers.
Results: Main emerging themes were that subjects
already made their own evaluations about smoking, did not believe
doctors' words could influence their smoking, believed that quitting
was down to the individual, and felt that doctors who took the
opportunity to talk about smoking should focus on the individual
patient. Smokers anticipated that they would be given antismoking
advice by doctors when attending for health care; they reacted by
shrugging this off, feeling guilty, or becoming annoyed. These
reactions affected the help seeking behaviour of some respondents.
Smokers were categorised as "contrary," "matter of fact," and
"self blaming," depending on their reported reaction to antismoking
advice.
Conclusions: Doctor-patient relationships can be
damaged if doctors routinely advise all smokers to quit. Where doctors
intervene, a patient centred approach
one that considers how
individual patients view themselves as smokers and how they are likely
to react to different styles of intervention
is the most
acceptable.
Key messages
© BMJ 1998
Read all Rapid Responses