Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Karl Michaëlsson a Department of Orthopaedics, University
Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden, b Departments of Medicine and Community and Family
Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire,
USA, c Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska
Institute Box 281, S-171 77 Stockholm,
Sweden, d Department of Epidemiology, Stockholm County
Council, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden, e Department of
Orthopaedics, Malmö General Hospital, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden, f Department of Internal Medicine,
University Hospital, S-751 85 Uppsala,
Sweden
Correspondence to: Dr Michaëlsson
Karl.Michaelsson{at}ortopedi.uu.se.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the relative risk of hip
fracture associated with postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy
including the effect of duration and recency of treatment, the addition
of progestins, route of administration, and dose.
Design: Population based case-control study.
Setting: Six counties in Sweden.
Subjects: 1327 women aged 50-81 years with hip
fracture and 3262 randomly selected controls.
Main outcome measure: Use of hormone replacement
therapy.
Results: Compared with women who had never used
hormone replacement therapy, current users had an odds ratio of 0.35 (95 % confidence interval 0.24 to 0.53) for hip fracture and former
users had an odds ratio of 0.76 (0.57 to 1.01). For every year of
therapy, the overall risk decreased by 6% (3% to 9%): 4% (1% to
8%) for regimens without progestin and 11% (6% to 16%) for those
with progestin. Last use between one and five years previously, with a
duration of use more than five years, was associated with an odds ratio
of 0.27 (0.08 to 0.94). After five years without hormone replacement
therapy the protective effect was substantially diminished (
7% to
48%). With current use, an initiation of therapy nine or more years
after the menopause gave equally strong reduction in risk for hip
fracture as an earlier start. Oestrogen treatment with skin patches
gave similar risk estimates as oral regimens.
Conclusions: Recent use of hormone replacement
therapy is required for optimum fracture protection, but therapy can be
started several years after the menopause. The protective effect
increases with duration of use, and an oestrogen-sparing effect is
achieved when progestins are included in the regimen.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+