Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sasha Shepperd a Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care,
University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences,
Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, b Health Services Research Unit,
Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of
Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, c Health Economics
Research Centre, Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care,
University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, d Northamptonshire Health
Authority, Northampton NN1 5DN
Correspondence to: Sasha Shepperd
Sasha.Shepperd{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Objectives: To examine the cost of providing hospital
at home in place of some forms of inpatient hospital care.
Design: Cost minimisation study within a randomised
controlled trial.
Setting: District general hospital and catchment area
of neighbouring community trust.
Subjects: Patients recovering from hip replacement
(n=86), knee replacement (n=86), and hysterectomy (n=238); elderly
medical patients (n=96); and patients with chronic obstructive airways
disease (n=32).
Interventions: Hospital at home or inpatient hospital
care.
Main outcome measures: Cost of hospital at home
scheme to health service, to general practitioners, and to patients and
their families compared with hospital care.
Results: No difference was detected in total
healthcare costs between hospital at home and hospital care for
patients recovering from a hip or knee replacement, or elderly medical
patients. Hospital at home significantly increased healthcare costs for
patients recovering from a hysterectomy (ratio of geometrical means
1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.29, P=0.009) and for those
with chronic obstructive airways disease (Mann-Whitney U test, P=0.01).
Hospital at home significantly increased general practitioners' costs
for elderly medical patients (Mann-Whitney U test, P<0.01) and for
those with chronic obstructive airways disease (P=0.02). Patient and
carer expenditure made up a small proportion of total costs.
Conclusion: Hospital at home care did not reduce
total healthcare costs for the conditions studied in this trial, and
costs were significantly increased for patients recovering from a
hysterectomy and those with chronic obstructive airways disease. There
was some evidence that costs were shifted to primary care for elderly
medical patients and those with chronic obstructive airways
disease.
Key messages