Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sasha Shepperd a Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care,
University of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences,
Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF , b Health Services Research Unit, Division of
Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Institute
of Health Sciences, c Health Economics Research
Centre, Division of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University
of Oxford, Institute of Health Sciences, d Northamptonshire Health Authority,
Northampton NN1 5DN
Correspondence to: Sasha Shepperd
Sasha.Shepperd{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Objectives: To compare hospital at home care with
inpatient hospital care in terms of patient outcomes.
Design: Randomised controlled trial with three month
follow up.
Setting: District general hospital and catchment area
of neighbouring community trust.
Subjects: Patients recovering from hip
replacement (n=86), knee replacement (n=86), and hysterectomy (n=238);
elderly medical patients (n=96); and patients with chronic obstructive
airways disease (n=32).
Interventions: Hospital at home care or inpatient
hospital care.
Main outcome measures: Dartmouth COOP chart to
measure patients' general health status; SF-36 to measure possible
limitations in physical functioning of patients with hysterectomy;
disease specific measures
chronic respiratory disease questionnaire,
Barthel index for elderly medical patients, Oxford hip score, and
Bristol knee score; hospital readmission and mortality data; carer
strain index to measure burden on carers; patients' and carers'
preferred form of care.
Results: At follow up, there were no major
differences in outcome between hospital at home care and hospital care
for any of the patient groups except that those recovering from hip
replacement reported a significantly greater improvement in quality of
life with hospital at home care (difference in change from baseline
value 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.88). Hospital at home
did not seem suitable for patients recovering from a knee replacement,
as 14 (30%) of patients allocated to hospital at home remained in
hospital. Patients in all groups preferred hospital at home care except
those with chronic obstructive airways disease. No differences were
detected for carer burden. Carers of patients recovering from knee
replacement preferred hospital at home care, while carers of patients
recovering from a hysterectomy preferred hospital care.
Conclusions: Few differences in outcome were
detected. Thus, the cost of hospital at home compared with hospital
care becomes a primary concern.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses