Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
George Taylor Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Dentistry,
University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2
4AB
g.b.taylor{at}ncl.ac.uk
Objectives: To discover the perceived size of pool of
doctors considered to be underperforming in general practice in the
Northern Deanery and to discover whether these perceptions are based on
formal assessments.
Design: Postal questionnaire.
Setting: Area covered by the Northern Deanery.
Subjects: Seven health authority directors of primary
care, seven secretaries of local medical committees, and 14 chief
officers of community health councils.
Results: The response rate was 100% for directors of
primary care and secretaries of local medical committees and, after one
reminder, 92% for chief officers of community health councils. Numbers
of doctors perceived to be underperforming ranged from none to over 15 in different health authority areas. Main areas for concern were
communication skills, clinical skills, and management skills.
Patients' representatives were concerned about lack of power of
patients and health authorities and doctors' lack of accountability.
Health authorities were concerned about lack of power, identification
of underperforming doctors, and doctors' professional loyalty. Local
medical committees were concerned about the problem of identifying
underperformance. A number of methods were used for identification, and
there was no common method applied.
Conclusions: The number of doctors thought
to be underperforming was small. Work still needs
to be done on developing tools that can be used in everyday
practice to enable doctors to confirm for themselves, their colleagues,
and their patients that they are providing an adequate level of
care.
Key messages
© BMJ 1998
Read all Rapid Responses