Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Peter R Croft a University of Keele, School of
Postgraduate Medicine, Industrial and Community Health Research
Centre, Hartshill, Stoke on Trent ST4 7QB, b ARC
Epidemiology Research Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences,
University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Manchester
M13 9PT
Correspondence to: Dr Macfarlane
G.Macfarlane{at}man.ac.uk
Objectives: To investigate the claim that 90% of
episodes of low back pain that present to general practice have
resolved within one month.
Design: Prospective study of all adults consulting in
general practice because of low back pain over 12 months with follow up at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after
consultation.
Setting: Two general practices in south Manchester.
Subjects: 490 subjects (203 men, 287 women) aged
18-75 years.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of patients who
have ceased to consult with low back pain after 3 months;
proportion of patients who are free of pain and back related disability
at 3 and 12 months.
Results: Annual cumulative consultation rate
among adults in the practices was 6.4%. Of the 463 patients who
consulted with a new episode of low back pain, 275 (59%) had only a
single consultation, and 150 (32%) had repeat consultations
confined to the 3 months after initial consultation. However, of
those interviewed at 3 and 12 months follow up, only 39/188 (21%) and 42/170 (25%) respectively had completely recovered in terms of pain
and disability.
Conclusions: The results are consistent with the
interpretation that 90% of patients with low back pain in primary care
will have stopped consulting with symptoms within three months. However
most will still be experiencing low back pain and related disability
one year after consultation.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+