BMJ 1998;316:1117-1122 ( 11 April )

Papers

Violations of the international code of marketing of breast milk substitutes: prevalence in four countries

Editorial by Costello and Sachdev

Anna Taylor, research coordinator. 

Interagency Group on Breastfeeding Monitoring, Unicef United Kingdom Committee, London WC2A 3NB

Correspondence to: Anna Taylor

Objective: To estimate the prevalence of violations of the international code of marketing of substitutes for breast milk in one city in each of Bangladesh, Poland, South Africa, and Thailand.
Design: Multistage random sampling was used to select pregnant women and mothers of infants 6 months old to interview at health facilities. Women were asked whether they had received free samples of substitutes for breast milk (including infant formula designed to meet the nutritional needs of infants from birth to 4 to 6 months of age, follow on formula designed to replace infant formula at the age of 4 to 6 months, and complementary foods for infants aged 6 months), bottles, or teats. The source of the free sample and when it had been given to the women was also determined. 3 health workers were interviewed at each facility to assess whether the facility had received free samples, to determine how they had been used, and to determine whether gifts had been given to health workers by companies that manufactured or distributed breast milk substitutes. Compliance with the marketing code for information given to health workers was evaluated using a checklist.
Setting: Health facilities in Dhaka, Bangladesh; Warsaw, Poland; Durban, South Africa; and Bangkok, Thailand.
Subjects: 1468 pregnant women, 1582 mothers of infants aged 6 months, and 466 health workers at 165 health facilities.
Main outcome measures: Number of free samples received by pregnant women, mothers, and health workers; number of gifts given to health workers; and availability of information that violated the code in health facilities.
Results: 97 out of 370 (26%) mothers in Bangkok reported receiving free samples of breast milk substitutes, infant formula, bottles, or teats compared with only 1 out of 385 mothers in Dhaka. Across the four cities from 3 out of 40 (8%) to 20 out of 40 (50%) health facilities had received free samples which were not being used for research or professional evaluation; from 2 out of 123 (2%) to 21 out of 119 (18%) health workers had received gifts from companies involved in the manufacturing or distribution of breast milk substitutes. From 6 out of 40 (15%) to 22 out of 39 (56%) health facilities information that violated the code had been provided by companies and was available to staff.
Conclusion: Violations of the code were detected with a simple survey instrument in all of the four countries studied. Governmental and non-governmental agencies should monitor the prevalence of code violations using the simple methodology developed for this study.

Key messages A simple multistage random sampling procedure can be used to interview women and health professionals to assess whether violations of the international code of marketing of substitutes for breast milk are occurring 3050 women and 466 health professionals were interviewed at 165 health facilities in Bangladesh, Poland, South Africa, and Thailand 97 out of 370 mothers in Bangkok reported receiving free samples of breast milk substitutes, infant formula, bottles, or teats compared with only 1 out of 385 mothers in Dhaka. In Bangkok health workers reported that 20 out of 40 health facilities had also received free samples. Most free samples were distributed by health facilities In Warsaw 56% of facilities surveyed were found to have information available for health workers that had been provided by manufacturers or distributors of breast milk substitutes in contravention of the code; 18% of health workers in Warsaw had received free gifts from manufacturers

---

© BMJ 1998
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Protecting breast feeding from breast milk substitutes

Harvey Marcovitch, Margaret Lynch, Keith Dodd, Anthony Costello, Harshpal S Sachdev, Mary Broadfoot, Jane Britten, Phyll Buchanan, Karen Hogg, Carolanne Lamont, Magda Sachs, and James Rothman
BMJ 1998 317: 949. [Extract] [Full Text]

Marketing of breast milk substitutes

Sarah Jacobs, Andrée Bronner, Susanna Centuori, Adriano Cattaneo, Riccardo Davanzo, Tea Burmaz, Menuela Del Santo, Maxwell Asante, and Kathleen Asante
BMJ 1998 317: 350. [Extract] [Full Text]

Violations of code of marketing breast milk substitutes are common
BMJ 1998 316: 0. [Full Text]

Protecting breast feeding from breast milk substitutes

Anthony Costello and Harshpal S Sachdev
BMJ 1998 316: 1103-1104. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lee, K. (2006). Global health promotion: how can we strengthen governance and build effective strategies?. HEALTH PROMOT INT 21: 42-50 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Waterston, T., Tumwine, J. (2003). Monitoring the marketing of infant formula feeds. BMJ 326: 113-114 [Full text]  
• Aguayo, V. M, Ross, J. S, Kanon, S., Ouedraogo, A. N (2003). Monitoring compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes in west Africa: multisite cross sectional survey in Togo and Burkina Faso. BMJ 326: 127-127 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Cattaneo, A., Buzzetti, R. (2001). Quality improvement report: Effect on rates of breast feeding of training for the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. BMJ 323: 1358-1362 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Latham, M. C (1999). Breast feeding reduces morbidity. BMJ 318: 1303-1304 [Full text]  
• Waterston, T., Nathwani, A., Morley, D., Shabde, N., Spencer, N., de Wildt, G., Zinkin, P., Candy, D. C A, Porter, A, Coussins, J. (1999). Should industry sponsor research?. BMJ 318: 260-260 [Full text]  
• Marcovitch, H., Lynch, M., Dodd, K., Costello, A., Sachdev, H. S, Broadfoot, M., Britten, J., Buchanan, P., Hogg, K., Lamont, C., Sachs, M., Rothman, J. (1998). Protecting breast feeding from breast milk substitutes. BMJ 317: 949a-949 [Full text]  
• Proctor, C. J, Sorell, T., Hannum, H., Edwards, G., Lucas, A., Rundall, P. (1998). Ethical debate: Should industry sponsor research? • Tobacco industry research: collaboration, not confrontation, is the best approach • Tobacco company sponsorship discredits medical but not all research • Condemning the drinks industry rules out potentially useful research • If the drinks industry does not clean up its act, pariah status is inevitable • Collaborative research with infant formula companies should not always be censored • How much research in infant feeding comes from unethical marketing?. BMJ 317: 333-339 [Full text]  
• Jacobs, S., Bronner, A., Centuori, S., Cattaneo, A., Davanzo, R., Burmaz, T., Del Santo, M., Asante, M., Asante, K. (1998). Marketing of breast milk substitutes. BMJ 317: 350-350 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Sponsorship of health-care journals by breast milk substitute companies.

Maxwell A Asante
bmj.com, 26 May 1998 [Full text]

IFM/IDFA RESPONSE TO BMJ ARTICLE BASED ON IGBM REPORT

Sarah Jacobs
bmj.com, 9 Jul 1998 [Full text]

Re: IFM/IDFA RESPONSE TO BMJ ARTICLE BASED ON IGBM REPORT

Mary Broadfoot
bmj.com, 24 Jul 1998 [Full text]