Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Annmarie Ruston Centre
for Health Services Studies, George Allen Wing, University of Kent at
Canterbury, Canterbury CT2 7NF
Correspondence to: Dr Ruston a.ruston{at}ukc.ac.uk
Objectives: To explore the circumstances and
factors that explain variations in response to a cardiac event and
to identify potentially modifiable factors.
Design: Qualitative analysis of semistructured, face
to face interviews with patients admitted to two district hospitals for
a cardiac event and with other people present at the time of the event.
Patients were divided into three groups according to the length of
delay between onset of symptoms and calling for medical help.
Subjects: 43 patients and 21 other people present at
the time of the cardiac event. Patients were divided into three groups
according to the length of time between onset of symptoms and seeking
medical help: non-delayers (<4 h; n=21), delayers (4-12 h; n=12),
and extended delayers (>12 h; n=10).
Main outcome measures: Decision making process,
strategies for dealing with symptoms, and perception of risk and of heart attacks before the event according to delay in seeking help.
Results: The illness and help seeking behaviour of
informants had several components, including warning, interpretation, preliminary action, re-evaluation, and final action stages. The length
of each stage was variable and depended on the extent to which
informants mobilised and integrated resources into a strategy to bring
their symptoms under control. There were obvious differences in
informants' knowledge of the symptoms that they associated with a
heart attack before the event. Non-delayers described a wider range of
symptoms before their heart attack and twice as many (13) considered
themselves to be potentially at risk of a heart attack compared with
the other two groups. For most informants the heart attack differed
considerably from their concept of a heart attack.
Conclusion: The most critical factor influencing the
time between onset of symptoms and calling for professional medical help is that patients and others recognise their symptoms as cardiac in
origin. This study suggests that various points of intervention in the
decision making process could assist symptom recognition and therefore
faster access to effective treatment.
Key messages
© BMJ 1998