Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Tom Fahey a Division of Primary Care, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall,
Bristol BS8 2PR, b United
Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's Hospitals, London
SE11 6SP
Correspondence to: Dr Fahey tom.fahey{at}bris.ac.uk
Objectives: To assess whether antibiotic treatment
for acute cough is effective and to measure the side effects of such
treatment.
Design: Quantitative systematic review of randomised
placebo controlled trials.
Data sources: Nine trials (8 published, 1 unpublished) retrieved from a systematic search (electronic databases,
contact with authors, contact with drug manufacturers, reference
lists); no restriction on language.
Main outcome measures: Proportion of subjects with
productive cough at follow up (7-11 days after consultation with general practitioner); proportion of subjects who had not improved clinically at follow up; proportion of subjects who reported side effects from taking antibiotic or placebo.
Results: Eight trials contributed to the
meta-analysis. Resolution of cough was not affected by antibiotic
treatment (relative risk 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.73 to 1.00)),
neither was clinical improvement at re-examination (relative risk 0.62 (0.36 to 1.09)). The side effects of antibiotic were more common in the
antibiotic group when compared to placebo (relative risk 1.51 (0.86 to
2.64)).
Conclusions: Treatment with antibiotic does not
affect the resolution of cough or alter the course of illness. The benefits of antibiotic treatment are marginal for most patients with
acute cough and may be outweighed by the side effects of treatment.
Key messages
Read all Rapid Responses