Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Liam Smeeth Department of
Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free Hospital School of
Medicine and University College London Medical School,
London NW3 2PF
Correspondence to: Dr L Smeeth
l.smeeth{at}ucl.ac.uk
Objective: To assess whether population screening for
impaired vision among older people in the community leads to improvements in vision.
Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled
trials of population screening in the community that included any assessment of vision or visual function with at least 6 months' follow
up.
Subjects: Adults aged 65 or over.
Main outcome measure: Proportions with visual
impairment in intervention and control groups with any method of
assessing visual impairment.
Results: There were no trials that primarily
assessed visual screening. Outcome data on vision were available for
3494 people in five trials of multiphasic assessment. All the trials used self reported measures for vision impairment, both as screening tools and as outcome measures. The inclusion of a visual screening component in the assessments did not result in improvements in self
reported visual problems (pooled odds ratio 1.04: 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.22). A small reduction (11%) in the number of older
people with self reported visual problems cannot be excluded.
Conclusions: Screening of asymptomatic older people
in the community is not justified on present evidence. Visual
impairment in this age group can usually be reduced with treatment. It
is unclear why no benefit was seen. Further work is needed to clarify what interventions are appropriate for older people with unreported impairment of vision.
Key messages
© BMJ 1998