BMJ 1997;315:1577-1582 (13 December)

Papers

The West of Scotland coronary prevention study: economic benefit analysis of primary prevention with pravastatin

J Caro, scientific director,a W Klittich, director of informatics,a A McGuire, professor,b I Ford, professor,c J Norrie, research fellow,c D Pettitt, associate director of modelling,d J McMurray, professor,e J Shepherd, professor,f for the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group

a Caro Research, 336 Baker Avenue, Concord, MA 01742, USA, b City University, Department of Economics, London EC1V 0HB, c University of Glasgow, Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow G12 8QQ, d Bristol-Myers Squibb Outcomes Research, PO Box 4000, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA, e University of Glasgow, CRI in Heart Failure, Wolfson Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, f Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF

The members of the executive committee are listed at the end of the article.Correspondence to: Dr Caro jcaro@caroresearch.com

Objective: To estimate the economic efficiency of using pravastatin to prevent the transition from health to cardiovascular disease in men with hypercholesterolaemia.
Design: Economic benefit analysis based on data from the West of Scotland coronary prevention study. Treatment specific hazards of developing cardiovascular disease according to various definitions were estimated. Scottish record linkage data provided disease specific survival. Cost estimates were based on extracontractual tariffs and event specific average lengths of stay calculated from the West of Scotland coronary prevention study.
Subjects: Men with hypercholesterolaemia similar to the subjects in the West of Scotland coronary prevention study.
Main outcome: Cost consequences, the number of transitions from health to cardiovascular disease prevented, the number needed to start treatment, and cost per life year gained.
Results: If 10 000 of these men started taking pravastatin, 318 of them would not make the transition from health to cardiovascular disease (number needed to treat, 31.4), at a net discounted cost of £20m over 5 years. These benefits imply an undiscounted gain of 2460 years of life, and thus £8121 per life year gained, or £20 375 per life year gained if benefits are discounted. Restriction to the 40% of men at highest risk reduces the number needed to treat to 22.5 (£5601 per life year gained (undiscounted) and £13 995 per life year gained (discounted)).
Conclusions: In subjects without evidence of prior myocardial infarction but who have hypercholesterolaemia, the use of pravastatin yields substantial health benefits at a cost that is not prohibitive overall and can be quite efficient in selected high risk subgroups.

Key messages

  • The West of Scotland coronary prevention study showed that pravastatin can prevent cardiovascular disease in men with hypercholesterolaemia

  • So far, reports have deemed this prevention unjustified due to adverse economic implications

  • This analysis, based on data from the West of Scotland coronary prevention study and extensive data from the Scottish record linkage system, shows that using pravastatin in this way is worth considering because of its substantial clinical benefit at a reasonable cost

  • Practitioners must now consider using pravastatin to prevent cardiovascular disease in men with hypercholesterolaemia

  • Increased economic efficiency may be obtained by restricting prevention to patients with additional risk factors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Economic benefit analysis of primary prevention with pravastatin
Paul Pharoah, Nick Freemantle, James Mason, and J Jaime Caro
BMJ 1998 316: 1241. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pletcher, M. J., Lazar, L., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Moran, A., Rodondi, N., Coxson, P., Lightwood, J., Williams, L., Goldman, L. (2009). Comparing Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Strategies for Lipid-Lowering. ANN INTERN MED 150: 243-254 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ford, I., Murray, H., Packard, C. J., Shepherd, J., Macfarlane, P. W., Cobbe, S. M., the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Gro, (2007). Long-Term Follow-up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. NEJM 357: 1477-1486 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hlatky, M. A, Owens, D. K, Sanders, G. D (2006). Cost-effectiveness as an outcome in randomized clinical trials. Clin Trials 3: 543-551 [Abstract]  
  • Franco, O. H, Steyerberg, E. W, Peeters, A., Bonneux, L. (2006). Effectiveness calculation in economic analysis: the case of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention.. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60: 839-845 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Winkelmayer, W. C., Benner, J. S., Glynn, R. J., Schneeweiss, S., Wang, P. S., Brookhart, M. A., Levin, R., Jackson, J. D., Avorn, J. (2006). Assessing Health State Utilities in Elderly Patients at Cardiovascular Risk. Med Decis Making 26: 247-254 [Abstract]  
  • Franco, O. H, Peeters, A., Looman, C. W N, Bonneux, L. (2005). Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 59: 927-933 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ong, H.T. (2005). The statin studies: from targeting hypercholesterolaemia to targeting the high-risk patient. QJM 98: 599-614 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wierzbicki, A. S (2005). The role of dyslipidaemia in coronary heart disease. British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease 5: S2-S6 [Abstract]  
  • Sutherland, G (2003). Smoking: can we really make a difference?. Heart 89: ii25-27 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • (2002). References. Circulation 106: 3373-3421 [Full text]  
  • Krumholz, H. M., Weintraub, W. S., Bradford, W. D., Heidenreich, P. A., Mark, D. B., Paltiel, A. D. (2002). Task Force #2--the cost of prevention: can we afford it? Can we afford not to do it?. J Am Coll Cardiol 40: 603-615 [Full text]  
  • Mark, D. B., Hlatky, M. A. (2002). Medical Economics and the Assessment of Value in Cardiovascular Medicine: Part II. Circulation 106: 626-630 [Full text]  
  • Simes, J, Furberg, C.D, Braunwald, E, Davis, B.R, Ford, I, Tonkin, A, Shepherd, J, for the Prosective Pravastatin Pooling project inv, (2002). Effects of pravastatin on mortality in patients with and without coronary heart disease across a broad range of cholesterol levels. The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling project. Eur Heart J 23: 207-215 [Abstract]  
  • Tice, J. A., Ross, E., Coxson, P. G., Rosenberg, I., Weinstein, M. C., Hunink, M. G. M., Goldman, P. A., Williams, L., Goldman, L. (2001). Cost-effectiveness of Vitamin Therapy to Lower Plasma Homocysteine Levels for the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: Effect of Grain Fortification and Beyond. JAMA 286: 936-943 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Varney, S. (2001). A cost-effectiveness analysis of bisoprolol for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 3: 365-371 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Luepker, R.V. (2001). Cholesterol reduction: What can we afford?. Eur Heart J 22: 720-721  
  • van Hout, B.A., Simoons, M.L. (2001). Cost-effectiveness of HMG coenzyme reductase inhibitors. Whom to treat?. Eur Heart J 22: 751-761 [Abstract]  
  • Pignone, M., Phillips, C., Mulrow, C. (2000). Use of lipid lowering drugs for primary prevention of coronary heart disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 321: 983-986 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ganz, D. A., Kuntz, K. M., Jacobson, G. A., Avorn, J. (2000). Cost-Effectiveness of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitor Therapy in Older Patients with Myocardial Infarction. ANN INTERN MED 132: 780-787 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Pickin, D M, McCabe, C J, Ramsay, L E, Payne, N, Haq, I U, Yeo, W W, Jackson, P R (1999). Cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) treatment related to the risk of coronary heart disease and cost of drug treatment. Heart 82: 325-332 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group, (1999). The effects of pravastatin on hospital admission in hypercholesterolemic middle-aged men: West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 33: 909-915 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Haq, I. U., Wallis, E. J., Yeo, W. W., Jackson, P. R., Ramsay, L. E., Krut, L. H., Kandzari, D. E., Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J., Mason, J. M., Freemantle, N., McDiarmid, T. D., Hensel, W. A., Papadakis, J. A., Mikhailidis, D. P., Walsh, J., Siegel, D., Swislocki, A. L. M., Downs, J. R., Gotto, Jr, A. M., Clearfield, M., Weis, S., Rosenson, R. S., Tangney, C. C. (1999). Coronary Events With Lipid-Lowering Therapy: The AFCAPS/TexCAPS Trial. JAMA 281: 414-419 [Full text]  
  • Fairhurst, K., Huby, G. (1998). From trial data to practical knowledge: qualitative study of how general practitioners have accessed and used evidence about statin drugs in their management of hypercholesterolaemia. BMJ 317: 1130-1134 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Pharoah, P., Freemantle, N., Mason, J., Caro, J J. (1998). Economic benefit analysis of primary prevention with pravastatin. BMJ 316: 1241-1241 [Full text]  
  • (1998). COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PRAVASTATIN IN ASYMPTOMATIC MEN. JWatch General 1998: 6-6 [Full text]  
  • Muldoon, M. F, Criqui, M. H (1997). The emerging role of statins in the prevention of coronary heart disease. BMJ 315: 1554-1555 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ