Papers

Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study

^a Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, ^b Department of Surgery, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London W12 0NN

Correspondence to: Professor Black n.black@lshtm.ac.uk

Objectives: To describe the impact of surgery for stress incontinence on the severity of symptoms, other mental and physical symptoms, and overall health. To describe the incidence of postoperative complications.
Design: Prospective cohort study; questionnaires completed by patients before and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Questionnaires completed by surgeons both before and after surgery.
Setting: 18 hospitals in the North Thames region.
Subjects: 442 women treated surgically for stress incontinence between January 1993 and June 1994. 367 women returned the 3 month questionnaire; 364 returned the 6 month questionnaire; and 359 returned the 12 month questionnaire. 49 surgeons provided perioperative information on 285 of the 442 women and postoperative information on 278.
Main outcome measures: Stress incontinence symptom severity index, other urinary symptoms, bowel function, mental health, complications, global measures.
Results: Most women (288; 87%) reported an improvement in the severity of their stress incontinence, though only 92 (28%) were cured (continent). These improvements persisted for at least 12 months. The likelihood of improvement was similar regardless of whether urodynamic pressure studies had been conducted before surgery. Following surgery, women were less likely to suffer from urinary frequency, nocturia, postvoid fullness, dysuria, and urgency. While mental health improved for 194 (71%), a quarter of women reported deterioration. Only 37 (10%) were satisfied with postoperative pain control. A third experienced one or more complications while in hospital, most commonly difficulty urinating. This problem affected 1 in 11 women after discharge. A year after surgery two thirds of women reported feeling better (251; 72%), that the outcome met or exceeded their expectations (230; 66%), and that they would recommend the operation to a friend in a similar situation (239; 68%). Surgeons tended to be more optimistic about the effects of surgery; they were satisfied with the outcome in 176 (85%) cases and would again treat 245 (94%) of the women as they had done previously.
Conclusions: Although surgery reduces the severity of stress incontinence it is not as effective as current textbooks suggest. Women considering surgery should be provided with more accurate information on the likelihood of an improvement in symptoms and the occurrence of complications, including postoperative pain. Urgency and urge incontinence should not be considered contraindications to surgery. The need for urodynamic assessment before surgery should be reappraised.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity

Vik Khullar, Linda Cardozo, Kelvin Boos, John Bidmead, Con Kelleher, Mark James, R A O'Connor, Jonathan R A Duckett, Gunnar Lose, Steen Walter, and Nick Black
BMJ 1998 317: 143. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Black, N, Browne, J, van der Meulen, J, Jamieson, L, Copley, L, Lewsey, J (2009). Is there overutilisation of cataract surgery in England?. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 93: 13-17 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Tannenbaum, C., Brouillette, J., Corcos, J. (2008). Rating improvements in urinary incontinence: do patients and their physicians agree?. Age Ageing 37: 379-383 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Albo, M. E., Richter, H. E., Brubaker, L., Norton, P., Kraus, S. R., Zimmern, P. E., Chai, T. C., Zyczynski, H., Diokno, A. C., Tennstedt, S., Nager, C., Lloyd, L. K., FitzGerald, M., Lemack, G. E., Johnson, H. W., Leng, W., Mallett, V., Stoddard, A. M., Menefee, S., Varner, R. E., Kenton, K., Moalli, P., Sirls, L., Dandreo, K. J., Kusek, J. W., Nyberg, L. M., Steers, W., the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network, (2007). Burch Colposuspension versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence. NEJM 356: 2143-2155 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ward, K., Hilton, P. (2002). Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 325: 67-67 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• CASTLEDEN, C M, DUFFIN, H. M (2000). Medical urology: a specialty long overdue. A personal view. Postgrad. Med. J. 76: 1-3 [Full text]  
• Khullar, V., Cardozo, L., Boos, K., Bidmead, J., Kelleher, C., James, M., O'Connor, R A, Duckett, J. R A, Lose, G., Walter, S., Black, N. (1998). Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity. BMJ 317: 143-143 [Full text]  
• (1998). SURGERY FOR STRESS INCONTINENCE HELPS -- SOMEWHAT. JWatch General 1998: 4-4 [Full text]  
• (1998). Stress Incontinence Surgery: Mixed Results. JWatch Women's Health 1998: 5-5 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Diagnosis should precede treatment

Douglas G Tincello
bmj.com, 2 May 1998 [Full text]