BMJ 1997;315:1403-1406 (29 November)
Papers
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of strategies to promote adherence to tuberculosis treatment
Jimmy Volmink,
director,a
Paul Garner,
division
head ba South African Cochrane Centre, Medical Research Council, Box 19070, Tygerberg 7505, Cape Town, South Africa,
b International Health Division, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5QA
Correspondence to: Dr Volmink cochrane@eagle.mrc.ac.za
Objective: To determine the effectiveness of
strategies
to promote adherence to treatment for tuberculosis.
Identification: Searches in Medline (1966 to August
1996), the Cochrane trials register (up to October 1996), and LILACS (Literatura
Latinoamericana
y del Caribe en Ciencias de la Salud) (1982 to September 1996); screening of references in
articles
on compliance and adherence; contact with experts in research on tuberculosis and
adherence.
Inclusion criteria: Randomised or
pseudorandomised
controlled trials of interventions to promote adherence with curative or preventive treatment for
tuberculosis, with at least one measure of adherence.
Main outcome measure: Relative risks and
95%
confidence intervals for estimates of effect for categorical outcomes.
Results: Five trials met the inclusion criteria. The
relative risk for tested reminder cards sent to patients who defaulted on treatment was 1.2
(95% confidence interval 1.1 to 1.4), for help given to patients by lay health workers 1.4
(1.1
to 1.8), for monetary incentives offered to patients 1.6 (1.3 to 2.0), for health education 1.2 (1.1
to
1.4), for a combination of a patient incentive and health education 2.4 (1.5 to 3.7) or 1.1 (1.0 to
1.2), and for intensive supervision of staff in tuberculosis clinics 1.2 (1.1 to 1.3). There were no
completed trials of directly observed treatment. All of the interventions tested improved
adherence.
On current evidence it is unclear whether health education by itself leads to better adherence to
treatment.
Conclusions: Reliable evidence is available to show
some specific strategies improve adherence to tuberculosis treatment, and these should be
adopted
in health systems, depending on their appropriateness to practice circumstances. Further
innovations
require testing to help find specific approaches that will be useful in low income countries.
Randomised controlled trials evaluating the independent effects of directly observed treatment
are
awaited.
|
Key messages
- Despite adequate delivery systems, some patients with tuberculosis do not complete
treatment
- Six specific interventions have been tested in randomised trials to improve adherence,
ranging from intensive staff supervision to monetary incentives for patients
- This systematic review of randomised trials found that all of the strategies tested seemed
to
improve adherence
- Independent effects of health education could not be assessed, and there are no trials yet
available that test the effectiveness of directly observed treatment
- Health providers should draw on what is known to be effective when designing strategies
appropriate to local needs and circumstances
- Further innovations, especially those that are feasible in developing countries, should be
evaluated in randomised controlled trials before being introduced into routine practice.
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Article
-
Incentives help vulnerable patients to stay well
- Sue Collinson
BMJ 2007 335: 317.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Collinson, S.
(2007). Incentives help vulnerable patients to stay well. BMJ
335: 317-317
[Full text]
-
White, M. C., Cuttler, S., Xin Zhao,
(2007). Linking Released Inmates to TB Clinic for Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: Why Is it so Difficult?. J Correct Health Care
13: 206-215
[Abstract]
-
Javanbakht, M., Prosser, P., Grimes, T., Weinstein, M., Farthing, C.
(2006). Efficacy of an Individualized Adherence Support Program with Contingent Reinforcement Among Nonadherent HIV-Positive Patients: Results From a Randomized Trial. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic Ill)
5: 143-150
[Abstract]
-
Dye, C., Watt, C. J., Bleed, D. M., Hosseini, S. M., Raviglione, M. C.
(2005). Evolution of Tuberculosis Control and Prospects for Reducing Tuberculosis Incidence, Prevalence, and Deaths Globally. JAMA
293: 2767-2775
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Di Perri, G., Bonora, S.
(2004). Which agents should we use for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis?. J Antimicrob Chemother
54: 593-602
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Grant, R. W., Devita, N. G., Singer, D. E., Meigs, J. B.
(2003). Polypharmacy and Medication Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care
26: 1408-1412
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Barker, R D, Glyn-Jones, J, Bothamley, G
(2003). DOT for all patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB in London?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health
57: 231-231
[Full text]
-
Barker, R D, Glyn-Jones, J, Bothamley, G
(2003). DOT for all patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB in London?. Thorax
58: 91-91
[Full text]
-
White, M. C., Tulsky, J. P., Goldenson, J., Portillo, C. J., Kawamura, M., Menendez, E.
(2002). Randomized Controlled Trial of Interventions to Improve Follow-up for Latent Tuberculosis Infection After Release From Jail. Arch Intern Med
162: 1044-1050
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
FitzGerald, J. M., Wang, L., Elwood, R. K.
(2000). Tuberculosis: 13. Control of the disease among aboriginal people in Canada. CMAJ
162: 351-355
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Hackner, D., Tu, G., Weingarten, S., Mohsenifar, Z.
(1999). Guidelines in Pulmonary Medicine: A 25-Year Profile. Chest
116: 1046-1062
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Squire, S B., Wilkinson, D.
(1997). Strengthening "DOTS" through community care for tuberculosis. BMJ
315: 1395-1396
[Full text]