Papers

Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

^a Pain Research, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, ^b John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU

Correspondence to: Dr Tramèr martin.tramer%mailgate.jr2@ox.ac.uk

Objective: To quantify the impact of duplicate data on estimates of efficacy.
Design: Systematic search for published full reports of randomised controlled trials investigating ondansetron's effect on postoperative emesis. Abstracts were not considered.
Data sources: Eighty four trials (11 980 patients receiving ondansetron) published between 1991 and September 1996.
Main outcome measures: Percentage of duplicated trials and patient data. Estimation of antiemetic efficacy (prevention of emesis) of the most duplicated ondansetron regimen. Comparison between the efficacy of non-duplicated and duplicated data.
Results: Data from nine trials had been published in 14 further reports, duplicating data from 3335 patients receiving ondansetron; none used a clear cross reference. Intravenous ondansetron 4 mg versus placebo was investigated in 16 reports not subject to duplicate publication, three reports subject to duplicate publication, and six duplicates of those three reports. The number needed to treat to prevent vomiting within 24 hours was 9.5 (95% confidence interval 6.9 to 15) in the 16 non-duplicated reports and 3.9 (3.3 to 4.8) in the three reports which were duplicated (P<0.00001). When these 19 were combined the number needed to treat was 6.4 (5.3 to 7.9). When all original and duplicate reports were combined (n=25) the apparent number needed to treat improved to 4.9 (4.4 to 5.6).
Conclusions: By searching systematically we found 17% of published full reports of randomised trials and 28% of the patient data were duplicated. Trials reporting greater treatment effect were significantly more likely to be duplicated. Inclusion of duplicated data in meta-analysis led to a 23% overestimation of ondansetron's antiemetic efficacy.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Cynthia Mulrow, Peter C Gøtzsche, John P A Ioannidis, Mike Clarke, P J Devereaux, Jos Kleijnen, and David Moher
BMJ 2009 339: b2700. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Simera, I., Altman, D. G (2009). Writing a research article that is "fit for purpose": EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines. Evid. Based Med. 14: 132-134 [Full text]  
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P.A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. ANN INTERN MED 151: W-65-W-94 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Marcovitch, H. (2009). How do potential conflicts of interest confuse medicine and public health?: How could disclosure of interests work better in medicine, epidemiology and public health?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 608-609 [Full text]  
• Wager, E., Green, R. (2009). Lessons from a case of overlapping publications. Sex. Transm. Infect. 85: 236-238 [Full text]  
• Liberati, A., Altman, D. G, Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C, Ioannidis, J. P A, Clarke, M., Devereaux, P J, Kleijnen, J., Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339: b2700-b2700 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wager, E, Fiack, S, Graf, C, Robinson, A, Rowlands, I (2009). Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. J. Med. Ethics 35: 348-353 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• DeAngelis, C. D. (2009). The Roman Article: Read It Again--in the Same Journal. JAMA 301: 1382-1383 [Full text]  
• Feng, Z.-Z., Shi, J., Zhao, X.-W., Xu, Z.-F. (2009). Meta-analysis of on-pump and off-pump coronary arterial revascularization.. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 87: 757-765 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Arrive, L., Lewin, M., Dono, P., Monnier-Cholley, L., Hoeffel, C., Tubiana, J.-M. (2008). Redundant Publication in the Journal Radiology. Radiology 247: 836-840 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Cicutto, L. (2008). Plagiarism*: Avoiding the Peril in Scientific Writing. Chest 133: 579-581 [Full text]  
• Wood, J. A. (2008). Methodology for Dealing With Duplicate Study Effects in a Meta-Analysis. Organizational Research Methods 11: 79-95 [Abstract]  
• Taylor, R., Najafi, F., Dobson, A. (2007). Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent. Int J Epidemiol 36: 1048-1059 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hoit, J. D. (2007). Salami Science. AJSLP 16: 94-94 [Full text]  
• Rodrigo, G. J., Rowe, B. H., Blitz, M., Blitz, S. (2006). There is no evidence to support the use of aerosolized magnesium for acute asthma.. Chest 130: 304-306 [Full text]  
• Rama, K. R. B. S., Apsingi, S., Iannotti, J. P. (2005). Effect of Humeral Component Anteversion on Shoulder Stability with Glenoid Component Retroversion * J.P. Iannotti replies:. JBJS 87: 2589-2589 [Full text]  
• Ezzo, J., Vickers, A., Richardson, M. A., Allen, C., Dibble, S. L., Issell, B., Lao, L., Pearl, M., Ramirez, G., Roscoe, J. A., Shen, J., Shivnan, J., Streitberger, K., Treish, I., Zhang, G. (2005). Acupuncture-Point Stimulation for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting. JCO 23: 7188-7198 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Benos, D. J., Fabres, J., Farmer, J., Gutierrez, J. P., Hennessy, K., Kosek, D., Lee, J. H., Olteanu, D., Russell, T., Shaikh, F., Wang, K. (2005). Ethics and scientific publication. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 29: 59-74 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• CHENNAGIRI, R. J. R., CRITCHLEY, P., GIELE, H. (2004). Duplicate Publication in the Journal of Hand Surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 29: 625-628 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• van der Heijden, G. J.M.G., Nathoe, H. M., Jansen, E. W.L., Grobbee, D. E. (2004). Meta-analysis on the effect of off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 26: 81-84 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mason, L., Moore, R A., Edwards, J. E, McQuay, H. J, Derry, S., Wiffen, P. J (2004). Systematic review of efficacy of topical rubefacients containing salicylates for the treatment of acute and chronic pain. BMJ 328: 995- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mason, L., Moore, R A., Derry, S., Edwards, J. E, McQuay, H. J (2004). Systematic review of topical capsaicin for the treatment of chronic pain. BMJ 328: 991- [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Reeves, D. S., Wise, R., Drummond, C. W. E. (2004). Duplicate publication: a cautionary tale. J Antimicrob Chemother 53: 411-412 [Full text]  
• von Elm, E., Poglia, G., Walder, B., Tramer, M. R. (2004). Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication: An Analysis of Articles Used in Systematic Reviews. JAMA 291: 974-980 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wager, E. (2003). Good practice in publication of clinical trial results. Br. J. Psychiatry 183 : 464-465 [Full text]  
• Tramer, M. R (2003). Treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. BMJ 327: 762-763 [Full text]  
• Dickersin, K., Rennie, D. (2003). Registering Clinical Trials. JAMA 290: 516-523 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Melander, H., Ahlqvist-Rastad, J., Meijer, G., Beermann, B. (2003). Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ 326: 1171-1173 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Yank, V, Barnes, D (2003). Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors. J. Med. Ethics 29: 109-114 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Cranney, A., Tugwell, P., Wells, G., Guyatt, G. (2002). Meta-Analyses of Therapies for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis * I. Systematic Reviews of Randomized Trials in Osteoporosis: Introduction and Methodology. Endocr. Rev. 23: 496-507 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wyatt, J, Guly, H (2002). Identifying the research question and planning the project. Emerg. Med. J. 19: 318-321 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Yank, V., Rennie, D. (2002). Reporting of Informed Consent and Ethics Committee Approval in Clinical Trials. JAMA 287: 2835-2838 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Moher, D., Schachter, H. M. (2002). Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies. CMAJ 166: 1674-1675 [Full text]  
• Stewart, L. A., Tierney, J. F. (2002). To IPD or not to IPD?: Advantages and Disadvantages of Systematic Reviews Using Individual Patient Data. Eval Health Prof 25: 76-97 [Abstract]  
• Juni, P., Holenstein, F., Sterne, J., Bartlett, C., Egger, M. (2002). Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol 31: 115-123 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Lee, A., Gin, T. (2002). Applying the Results of Quantitative Systematic Reviews to Clinical Practice. Anesth. Analg. 94: 372-377 [Full text]  
• Holt, S., Suder, A., Weatherall, M., Cheng, S., Shirtcliffe, P., Beasley, R., Herxheimer, A. (2001). Dose-response relation of inhaled fluticasone propionate in adolescents and adults with asthma: meta-analysis Commentary: Dosage needs systematic and critical review. BMJ 323: 253-253 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• McQueen, M. J. (2001). Overview of Evidence-based Medicine: Challenges for Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine. Clin. Chem. 47: 1536-1546 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sterne, J. A C, Egger, M., Smith, G. D. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 323: 101-105 [Full text]  
• Ioannidis, J. P. A., Hesketh, P. J., Lau, J. (2000). Contribution of Dexamethasone to Control of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Evidence. JCO 18: 3409-3422 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Beatty, S, Eong, K G A. (2000). Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute occlusion of the central retinal artery: a meta-analysis of the published data. Br J Ophthalmol 84: 914-916 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• WEST, R R (2000). Evidence based medicine overviews, bulletins, guidelines, and the new consensus. Postgrad. Med. J. 76: 383-389 [Full text]  
• Johansen, H. K., Gotzsche, P. C. (1999). Problems in the Design and Reporting of Trials of Antifungal Agents Encountered During Meta-analysis. JAMA 282: 1752-1759 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rennie, D. (1999). Fair Conduct and Fair Reporting of Clinical Trials. JAMA 282: 1766-1768 [Full text]  
• Domino, K. B., Anderson, E. A., Polissar, N. L., Posner, K. L. (1999). Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Ondansetron, Droperidol, and Metoclopramide for Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting: A Meta-Analysis. Anesth. Analg. 88: 1370-1370 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Knoll, G. A, Bell, R. C (1999). Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 318: 1104-1107 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sykes, R. (1998). Being a modern pharmaceutical company. BMJ 317: 1172-1180 [Full text]  
• Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Klassen, T. P. (1998). Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews: III. How Did the Authors Synthesize the Data and Make Their Conclusions?. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152: 915-920 [Full text]  
• Stuck, A. E, Rubenstein, L. Z, Wieland, D., Vandenbroucke, J. P, Irwig, L., Macaskill, P., Berry, G., Glasziou, P., Seagroatt, V., Stratton, I., Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Minder, C., Langhorne, P., Song, F., Gilbody, S. (1998). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 316: 469-469 [Full text]  
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D. (1998). meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies. BMJ 316: 61-66 [Full text]  
• Naylor, C D. (1997). Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research. BMJ 315: 617-619 [Full text]