BMJ 1997;314:277 (25 January)

Information in practice

Information needed to decide about cardiovascular treatment in primary care

John Robson, senior lecturer a

a Academic Department of General Practice St Bartholomew's and the London Hospital Medical School Queen Mary and Westfield College London E1 4NS

There is growing consensus that treatment of cardiovascular risks should be based on multiple rather than single factors and on absolute rather than relative risks. Thresholds for treatment should reflect the level of absolute risk at which the benefits and hazards of treating outweigh the benefits and hazards of not treating. Once a decision has been made to initiate a treatment programme, clinicians need to know the patient's absolute risk. At this level of risk, do the benefits of treatment outweigh the hazards? Given this information, which treatment option does the patient prefer? Using cardiovascular disease as an example, I review some measures that assist decision making in primary care. Practice guidelines should routinely include accessible presentation of treatment outcomes on benefit, hazard, and costs for a range of absolute risks. These measures enable patients and their doctors to weigh the pros and cons of treatment in their particular circumstances.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ridderstolpe, L, Collste, G, Rutberg, H, Ahlfeldt, H (2003). Priority setting in cardiac surgery: a survey of decision making and ethical issues. J. Med. Ethics 29: 353-358 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lampe, F.C, Whincup, P.H, Wannamethee, S.G, Shaper, A.G, Walker, M, Ebrahim, S (2000). The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men. Eur Heart J 21: 1052-1062 [Abstract]  
  • Haq, I U, Ramsay, L E, Yeo, W W, Jackson, P R, Wallis, E J (1999). Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men. Heart 81: 40-46 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ