Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
a Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ospedale San Gerardo di Monza, III Branch of the University of Milan, Milan, Italy, b Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
Correspondence to: Dr G Zanetta, Gynecologic Surgery, Eisenberg 5A, Mayo Clinic, Rochester 55905 MN, USA.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the potential of expectant management for simple ovarian cysts diagnosed by transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasonography. To compare the results of needle aspiration with those achieved with simple observation.
Design: Randomised trial.
Setting: Hospital department of obstetrics and gynaecology.
Subjects: 278 women with simple cysts randomly allocated to simple observation (143) or ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (135) between 1990 and 1994.
Main outcome measures: Resolution of cyst or development of malignancy.
Results: After six months 269 were available for follow up. The rate of resolution was 46% (59/128) with aspiration and 44.6% (63/141) with observation. Only the diameter of the cyst (P<0.0001) was a significant independent prognostic factor for resolution in a multivariate analysis. Age and treatment had no significant effect. One woman was subsequently found to have borderline malignant changes on histopathological examination. Her cyst was detected by transabdominal ultrasonography.
Conclusions: Expectant management for up to six months does not cause risks for the patients and allows spontaneous resolution in over a third of cases, avoiding the costs and risks of unnecessary surgery. Aspiration does not provide better results than simple observation
|
Key messages
|
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?