General practice

Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial

^a University of Oxford, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, ^b Northamptonshire Centre for Oncology, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton NN1 5BD, ^c Princess Margaret Hospital, Swindon SN1 4JU

Correspondence to: Dr E Grunfeld, Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1H 8L6.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect on time to diagnosis of recurrence and on quality of life of transferring primary responsibility for follow up of women with breast cancer in remission from hospital to general practice.
Design: Randomised controlled trial with 18 month follow up in which women received routine follow up either in hospital or in general practice.
Subjects and setting: 296 women with breast cancer in remission receiving regular follow up care at district general hospitals in England.
Main outcome measures: Time between first presentation of symptoms to confirmation of recurrence; quality of life measured by specific dimensions of the SF-36 schedule, the EORTC symptom scale, and hospital anxiety and depression scale.
Results: Most recurrences (18/26, 69%) presented as interval events, and almost half (7/16, 44%) of the recurrences in the hospital group presented first to general practice. The median time to hospital confirmation of recurrence was 21 days in the hospital group (range 1-376 days) and 22 days in the general practice group (range 4-64). The differences between groups in the change in SF-36 mean scores from baseline were small: -1.8 (95% confidence interval -7.2 to 3.5) for social functioning, 0.5 (-4.1 to 5.1) for mental health, and 0.6 (-3.6 to 4.8) for general health perception. The change from baseline in the mean depression score was higher in the general practice group at the mid-trial assessment (difference 0.6, 0.1 to 1.2) but there was no significant difference between groups in the anxiety score or the EORTC scales.
Conclusion: General practice follow up of women with breast cancer in remission is not associated with increase in time to diagnosis, increase in anxiety, or deterioration in health related quality of life. Most recurrences are detected by women as interval events and present to the general practitioner, irrespective of continuing hospital follow up.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial

Kinta Beaver, Debbie Tysver-Robinson, Malcolm Campbell, Mary Twomey, Susan Williamson, Andrew Hindley, Shabbir Susnerwala, Graham Dunn, and Karen Luker
BMJ 2009 338: a3147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care

Dick Rainsbury
BMJ 1996 313: 1547. [Extract] [Full Text]

More use should be made of specialist nurses

Ian Kunkler, Alison Tierney, Nora Jodrell, and John Forbes
BMJ 1996 313: 1547-1548. [Extract] [Full Text]

Open door and listening ear are best support for patients

Stephen A Hall
BMJ 1996 313: 1548. [Extract] [Full Text]

Most recurrences after breast conservation are detected by regular hospital visits

J M Dixon and B Norman
BMJ 1996 313: 1548. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Del Giudice, M. E., Grunfeld, E., Harvey, B. J., Piliotis, E., Verma, S. (2009). Primary Care Physicians' Views of Routine Follow-Up Care of Cancer Survivors. JCO 27: 3338-3345 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ouwens, M., Hulscher, M., Hermens, R., Faber, M., Marres, H., Wollersheim, H., Grol, R. (2009). Implementation of integrated care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of interventions and effects. Int J Qual Health Care 21: 137-144 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mao, J. J., Bowman, M. A., Stricker, C. T., DeMichele, A., Jacobs, L., Chan, D., Armstrong, K. (2009). Delivery of Survivorship Care by Primary Care Physicians: The Perspective of Breast Cancer Patients. JCO 27: 933-938 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Beaver, K., Tysver-Robinson, D., Campbell, M., Twomey, M., Williamson, S., Hindley, A., Susnerwala, S., Dunn, G., Luker, K. (2009). Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ 338: a3147-a3147 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Smedira, H. J., Patrick, R. J., Rybicki, L. A., Crowe, J. P. (2008). Integrating Medical Breast Specialists Into the Traditional Breast Center Practice Model: A Review of 11 Years of Experience. Arch Intern Med 168: 2042-2045 [Full text]  
• Murray, S. A, Boyd, K., Campbell, C., Cormie, P., Thomas, K., Weller, D., Kendall, M. (2008). Implementing a service users' framework for cancer care in primary care: an action research study. Fam Pract 25: 78-85 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Donnelly, P, Hiller, L, Bathers, S, Bowden, S, Coleman, R (2007). Questioning specialists' attitudes to breast cancer follow-up in primary care. Ann Oncol 18: 1467-1476 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Murchie, P., Hannaford, P. C, Wyke, S., Nicolson, M. C, Campbell, N. C (2007). Designing an integrated follow-up programme for people treated for cutaneous malignant melanoma: a practical application of the MRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Fam Pract 24: 283-292 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Earle, C. C. (2006). Failing to Plan Is Planning to Fail: Improving the Quality of Care With Survivorship Care Plans. JCO 24: 5112-5116 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Oeffinger, K. C., McCabe, M. S. (2006). Models for Delivering Survivorship Care. JCO 24: 5117-5124 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ayanian, J. Z., Jacobsen, P. B. (2006). Enhancing Research on Cancer Survivors. JCO 24: 5149-5153 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Grunfeld, E. (2006). Looking Beyond Survival: How Are We Looking at Survivorship?. JCO 24: 5166-5169 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Khatcheressian, J. L., Wolff, A. C., Smith, T. J., Grunfeld, E., Muss, H. B., Vogel, V. G., Halberg, F., Somerfield, M. R., Davidson, N. E. (2006). American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 Update of the Breast Cancer Follow-Up and Management Guidelines in the Adjuvant Setting. JCO 24: 5091-5097 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Grunfeld, E., Levine, M. N., Julian, J. A., Coyle, D., Szechtman, B., Mirsky, D., Verma, S., Dent, S., Sawka, C., Pritchard, K. I., Ginsburg, D., Wood, M., Whelan, T. (2006). Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care. JCO 24: 848-855 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Khatcheressian, J. L., Smith, T. J. (2006). Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care. JCO 24: 835-837 [Full text]  
• de Bock, G.H., Bonnema, J., van Der Hage, J., Kievit, J., van de Velde, C.J.H. (2004). Effectiveness of Routine Visits and Routine Tests in Detecting Isolated Locoregional Recurrences After Treatment for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. JCO 22: 4010-4018 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mandelblatt, J., Armetta, C., Yabroff, K. R., Liang, W., Lawrence, W. (2004). Descriptive Review of the Literature on Breast Cancer Outcomes: 1990 Through 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004: 8-44 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gotay, C. C. (2004). Assessing Cancer-Related Quality of Life Across a Spectrum of Applications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2004: 126-133 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hiramanek, N (2004). Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer. Postgrad. Med. J. 80: 172-176 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Maher, E J, Millar, D (2003). Shared care: step down or step up?. Qual Saf Health Care 12: 242-242 [Full text]  
• Kattlove, H., Winn, R. J. (2003). Ongoing Care of Patients After Primary Treatment for Their Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 53: 172-196 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Earle, C. C., Burstein, H. J., Winer, E. P., Weeks, J. C. (2003). Quality of Non-Breast Cancer Health Maintenance Among Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors. JCO 21: 1447-1451 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Earle, C. C., Grunfeld, E., Coyle, D., Cripps, M. C., Stern, H. S. (2003). Cancer physicians' attitudes toward colorectal cancer follow-up. Ann Oncol 14: 400-405 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Goodwin, P. J., Black, J. T., Bordeleau, L. J., Ganz, P. A. (2003). Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Randomized Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer--Taking Stock. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 263-281 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Moore, S., Corner, J., Haviland, J., Wells, M., Salmon, E., Normand, C., Brada, M., O'Brien, M., Smith, I. (2002). Nurse led follow up and conventional medical follow up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial. BMJ 325: 1145-1145 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Grilli, R. (2001). Specialization and cancer: words with too many meanings should be handled with care. CMAJ 164: 210-211 [Full text]  
• Bernhardt, B., Hayes, D., Loprinzi, C. L., Smith, T. J. (2000). Correspondence Re: ""Doc, Shouldn't We Be Getting Some Tests?"". JCO 18: 3739-3741 [Full text]  
• Gorman, D. R, Mackinnon, H., Storrie, M., Wilson, G. S, Parker, S. (2000). The general practice perspective on cancer services in Lothian. Fam Pract 17: 323-328 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Goodwin, P. J (2000). Women with breast cancer were more satisfied with general practitioner care than with outpatient clinic care. Evid. Based Med. 5: 89-89 [Full text]  
• Summerton, N. (2000). General practitioners and cancer. BMJ 320: 1090-1091 [Full text]  
• Williams, J G, Cheung, W Y, Russell, I T, Cohen, D R, Longo, M, Lervy, B (2000). Open access follow up for inflammatory bowel disease: pragmatic randomised trial and cost effectiveness study. BMJ 320: 544-548 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Smith, T. J., Davidson, N. E., Schapira, D. V., Grunfeld, E., Muss, H. B., Vogel, V. G. III, Somerfield, M. R. (1999). American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 Update of Recommended Breast Cancer Surveillance Guidelines. JCO 17: 1080-1080 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jewell, D. (1997). Supporting diversity in primary care. BMJ 314: 1706-1706 [Full text]  
• Rainsbury, D. (1996). Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care. BMJ 313: 1547-1547 [Full text]  
• Hall, S. A (1996). Open door and listening ear are best support for patients. BMJ 313: 1548-1548 [Full text]  
• Kirkbride, P., Vallis, K. (1996). Study of open access centre for patients with breast cancer is planned. BMJ 313: 1547a-1547 [Full text]  
• Kunkler, I., Tierney, A., Jodrell, N., Forbes, J. (1996). More use should be made of specialist nurses. BMJ 313: 1547b-1548 [Full text]  
• Dixon, J M, Norman, B (1996). Most recurrences after breast conservation are detected by regular hospital visits. BMJ 313: 1548a-1548 [Full text]  
• (1996). Breast Cancer Follow-up By Generalists (and Patients) May Be Enough. JWatch Women's Health 1996: 19-19 [Full text]