BMJ 1996;313:595-599 (7 September)

General practice

Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study

Robert P H Wilson, research pharmacist,a Juanita Hatcher, senior research fellow in epidemiology,a Stuart Barton, senior lecturer in primary care therapeutics,a Tom Walley, professor of clinical pharmacology a

a Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX

Correspondence to Professor Walley.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the variation in prescribing among general practices by examining the contribution to this variation of fundholding, training status, partnership status, and the level of deprivation in the practice population and to investigate the extent to which fundholding has been responsible for any changes in prescribing.
Design: Analysis of prescribing data (PACT) for the years 1990-1 (before fundholding) and 1993-4 (after fundholding). Use of multiple linear regressions to investigate the variation among practices in total prescribing costs (net ingredient cost per prescribing unit), prescribing volume (items per 1000 prescribing units), and mean cost per item in each of the two years and also the change in these variables between years.
Setting: Former Mersey region.
Subjects: 384 practices.
Results: The models developed explained the variation in cost per item (43% of variation explained for 1990-1, 38% for 1993-4) and prescribing volume (34% for 1990-1, 38% for 1993-4) better than the variation in total prescribing costs (3% for 1990-1, 7% for 1993-4). The models developed to explain the change in these variables between years did not explain more than 10% of the variation. Most of the explained variation in the change in total prescribing costs was accounted for by fundholding. Of the £3.71 saved by first wave fundholders compared with non-fundholders £3.57 was attributable to fundholding alone.
Conclusion: In neither year did fundholding make a major contribution to the variation in prescribing behaviour among practices, which was better explained by deprivation, training status, and partnership status, but it did seem largely responsible for differences in the rise of total prescribing costs between fundholders and non-fundholders.

Key messages

  • Much of the variation in prescribing practice remains unexplained.

  • Fundholding is the major contributor to the dif- ferences in the rise in prescribing costs between fundholders and non-fundholders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in practices
Sarah J Roberts
BMJ 1996 313: 1551. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Naish, J., Moser, K., Sturdy, P., Carter, Y. H. (1999). Using administrative data for primary care research: the City and East London General Practice Database Project. Health Informatics Journal 5: 30-34 [Abstract]  
  • Greenhalgh, T. (1998). Effective prescribing at practice level should be identified and rewarded. BMJ 316: 750-750 [Full text]  
  • Roberts, S. J (1996). Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in practices. BMJ 313: 1551a-1551 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ