General practice

Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars

^a Department of General Practice and Primary Care and Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9JP, ^b Health Services Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, ^c Accident and Emergency Department, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS

Correspondence to: Dr Dale.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare outcome and costs of general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars treating patients who attended accident and emergency department with problems assessed at triage as being of primary care type.
Design: Prospective intervention study which was later costed.
Setting: Inner city accident and emergency department in south east London.
Subjects: 4641 patients presenting with primary care problems: 1702 were seen by general practitioners, 2382 by senior house officers, and 557 by registrars.
Main outcome measures: Satisfaction and outcome assessed in subsample of 565 patients 7-10 days after hospital attendance and aggregate costs of hospital care provided.
Results: Most patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with clinical assessment (430/562 (77%)), treatment (418/557 (75%)), and consulting doctor's manner (434/492 (88%)). Patients' reported outcome and use of general practice in 7-10 days after attendance were similar: 206/241 (85%), 224/263 (85%), and 52/59 (88%) of those seen by general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars respectively were fully recovered or improving (²=0.35, P=0.840), while 48/240 (20%), 48/268 (18%), and 12/57 (21%) respectively consulted a general practitioner or practice nurse (²=0.51, P=0.774). Excluding costs of admissions, the average costs per case were £19.30, £17.97, and £11.70 for senior house officers, registrars, and general practitioners respectively. With cost of admissions included, these costs were £58.25, £44.68, and £32.30 respectively.
Conclusion: Management of patients with primary care needs in accident and emergency department by general practitioners reduced costs with no apparent detrimental effect on outcome. These results support new role for general practitioners.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Better services and more choice in the NHS

Paul Wallace, Ann Bowling, and Jennifer A Roberts
BMJ 2006 333: 56-57. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Moore, L, Deehan, A, Seed, P, Jones, R (2009). Characteristics of frequent attenders in an emergency department: analysis of 1-year attendance data. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 263-267 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Stephenson, T (2007). How can the UK National Health Service be broke?. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 189-190 [Full text]  
• Giesen, P, Franssen, E, Mokkink, H, van den Bosch, W, van Vugt, A, Grol, R (2006). Patients either contacting a general practice cooperative or accident and emergency department out of hours: a comparison.. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 731-734 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wallace, P., Bowling, A., Roberts, J. A (2006). Better services and more choice in the NHS. BMJ 333: 56-57 [Full text]  
• Palmer, C D, Jones, K H, Jones, P A, Polacarz, S V, Evans, G W L (2005). Urban legend versus rural reality: patients' experience of attendance at accident and emergency departments in west Wales. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 165-170 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• van Uden, C J T, Crebolder, H F J M (2004). Does setting up out of hours primary care cooperatives outside a hospital reduce demand for emergency care?. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 722-723 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ni Bhrolchain, C M (2004). Who should provide primary care for children?. Arch. Dis. Child. 89: 116-117 [Full text]  
• Coleman, P, Irons, R, Nicholl, J (2001). Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency?. Emerg. Med. J. 18: 482-487 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wardrope, J, McCormick, S (2001). Article 4. Team structure, waiting time and a psychotic patient is banging on your door. Emerg. Med. J. 18: 382-385 [Full text]  
• Smyth, M G, Hoult, J, Pelosi, A. J, Jackson, G. A (2000). The home treatment enigma • Home treatment---enigmas and fantasies. BMJ 320: 305-309 [Full text]  
• Rajpar, S. F, Smith, M. A, Cooke, M. W (2000). Study of choice between accident and emergency departments and general practice centres for out of hours primary care problems. Emerg. Med. J. 17: 18-21 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Dixon, J., Holland, P., Mays, N. (1998). Primary care: core values Developing primary care: gatekeeping, commissioning, and managed care. BMJ 317: 125-128 [Full text]  
• Robertson-Steel, I R S (1998). Providing primary care in the accident and emergency department. BMJ 316: 409-410 [Full text]  
• Pringle, M. (1997). Primary care: opportunities and threats: Distributing primary care fairly. BMJ 314: 595-595 [Full text]  
• Cooke, M. (1996). Employing general practitioners in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 313: 628a-628 [Full text]  
• Phillips, H. (1996). All doctors should spend time in general practice to learn skills of GPs. BMJ 313: 628b-628 [Full text]