General practice

Waiting list management in general practice: a review of orthopaedic patients

^a Four Elms Medical Centre, Cardiff CF1 2AF, ^b Cardiff Royal Infirmary, Cardiff CF2 1SZ, ^c Department of General Practice, Llanedeyrn, Cardiff CF3 7PN

Correspondence to: Dr Elwyn.

Abstract

Objective: To review all patients on a current general practice orthopaedic waiting list for outpatient appointments with regard to accuracy of the list, clinical priority, and need for further radiological investigation before hospital attendance.
Design: Record review by one general practitioner and a radiologist, and discussion with patients of management alternatives.
Setting: Six partner city centre urban fund-holding general practice, list size 8651 (29% low deprivation payment status).
Subjects: 116 adults on an orthopaedic waiting list.
Main outcome measures: List accuracy (patient details and status on waiting list); clinical priority (severity of condition); further investigations (results of tests after radiological review).
Results: 32 patients (28%) were removed from the waiting list because of inaccuracies. 14 patients were considered to be high priority and referred to other hospitals by utilising waiting list initiative funds. Of these patients, five agreed to referral to another hospital (treatment completed on average within three months of rereferral), six did not wish to be rereferred, and two did not attend to discuss the offer and remained on the original waiting list. One prioritised patient had further radiological investigations, was reassured, and was taken off the waiting list. 10 patients had further investigations. These resulted in six patients being referred to other hospitals, three being taken off the waiting list, and one seeking private care.
Conclusions: Systematic review of patients on an orthopaedic waiting list of one general practice, though time consuming, led to the identification of inaccuracies in the list and changes in management. Costs need further evaluation, but if the findings occur widely substantial benefits could be achieved for patients.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Elwyn, G., Owen, D., Roberts, L., Wareham, K., Duane, P., Allison, M., Sykes, A. (2007). Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia. Qual Saf Health Care 16: 67-70 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Lewis, S., Barer, M. L., Sanmartin, C., Sheps, S., Shortt, S. E.D., McDonald, P. W. (2000). Ending waiting-list mismanagement: principles and practice. CMAJ 162: 1297-1300 [Full text]  
• Sanmartin, C., Shortt, S. E.D., Barer, M. L., Sheps, S., Lewis, S., McDonald, P. W. (2000). Waiting for medical services in Canada: lots of heat, but little light. CMAJ 162: 1305-1310 [Full text]