BMJ 1996;312:813-816 (30 March)

Papers

Psychological support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a randomised study

June M C McArdle, research nurse,a W David George, professor of surgery,b Colin S McArdle, honorary professor of surgery,a David C Smith, consultant surgeon,c Alastair R Moodie, former chairman,d A V Mark Hughson, consultant psychiatrist,e Gordon D Murray, director f

a University Department of Surgery, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G31 2ER, b University Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow G11 6NT, c Division of Surgery, Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow G42 9TY, d Tak Tent, 100 University Place, Glasgow G12 6SQ, e Division of Psychiatry, Leverndale Hospital, Glasgow G53 7TU, f Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow G12 8QQ

Correspondence to: Dr Hughson.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of support from a nurse specialising in breast care and a voluntary support organisation on prevalence of psychological morbidity after surgery for breast cancer.
Design: Prospective randomised study.
Setting: Three teaching hospitals in Glasgow with established breast clinics.
Subjects: 272 women aged less than 70 years undergoing surgery for breast cancer.
Interventions: Patients were randomly allocated to receive routine care from ward staff, routine care plus support from breast care nurse, routine care plus support from voluntary organisation, or routine care plus support from nurse and organisation.
Main outcome measures: Prevalence of psychological morbidity as assessed by self rating scales: 28 item general health questionnaire and its subscales, and hospital anxiety and depression scale. Measurements were made at first postoperative clinic visit and at three, six, and 12 months after surgery.
Results: On each self rating scale, psychological morbidity tended to fall over the 12 month period. For each scale, scores were consistently lower in patients offered support from breast care nurse alone compared with the other groups, which were similar to each other. Differences were significant or nearly so: P values were 0.015 (28 item general health questionnaire), 0.027 (anxiety and insomnia), 0.072 (severe depression), 0.053 (somatic symptoms), 0.031 (social dysfunction), 0.093 (hospital anxiety), and 0.003 (hospital depression).
Conclusion: Support from breast care nurse can significantly reduce psychological morbidity, as measured by self rating scales, in women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Key messages

  • Key messages

  • The value of different forms of psychological support for breast cancer patients is uncertain

  • We compared effect of four different types of support for patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer: routine care from ward staff, routine care plus support from specialist breast care nurse, routine care plus support from voluntary organisation, or routine care plus support from nurse and organisation

  • Scores of psychological morbidity were consistently lower in patients offered support from breast care nurse alone compared with the other groups, which were similar to each other

  • Psychological support from an experienced breast care nurse can reduce psychological morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial
Kinta Beaver, Debbie Tysver-Robinson, Malcolm Campbell, Mary Twomey, Susan Williamson, Andrew Hindley, Shabbir Susnerwala, Graham Dunn, and Karen Luker
BMJ 2009 338: a3147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Psychological support for patients having breast cancer surgery
Karin Friedli and Michael King
BMJ 1996 313: 360-361. [Extract] [Full Text]

Support groups whose members have themselves had breast cancer are helpful
Helen Caulton
BMJ 1996 313: 361. [Extract] [Full Text]

Patients' consent should have been sought
Heather Goodare
BMJ 1996 313: 361. [Extract] [Full Text]

Data may not have been summarised appropriately
Derek Lowe
BMJ 1996 313: 361. [Extract] [Full Text]

Reply from dissenting author
Alastair R Moodie
BMJ 1996 313: 362. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Beaver, K., Tysver-Robinson, D., Campbell, M., Twomey, M., Williamson, S., Hindley, A., Susnerwala, S., Dunn, G., Luker, K. (2009). Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial. BMJ 338: a3147-a3147 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Jacobsen, P. B., Jim, H. S. (2008). Psychosocial Interventions for Anxiety and Depression in Adult Cancer Patients: Achievements and Challenges. CA Cancer J Clin 58: 214-230 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Schofield, P., Carey, M., Love, A., Nehill, C., Wein, S. (2006). 'Would you like to talk about your future treatment options?' discussing the transition from curative cancer treatment to palliative care. Palliat Med 20: 397-406 [Abstract]  
  • Moyer, A., Salovey, P. (1999). Predictors of Social Support and Psychological Distress in Women with Breast Cancer. J Health Psychol 4: 177-191 [Abstract]  
  • Bonnema, J., van Wersch, A. M E A, van Geel, A. N, Pruyn, J. F A, Schmitz, P. I M, Paul, M. A, Wiggers, T. (1998). Medical and psychosocial effects of early discharge after surgery for breast cancer: randomised trial. BMJ 316: 1267-1271 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Doyal, L., Tobias, J S, Warnock, M., Power, L., Goodare, H. (1998). Ethical debate: Informed consent in medical research • Informed consent---a response to recent correspondence • Changing the BMJ's position on informed consent would be counterproductive • Informed consent---a publisher's duty • Trial subjects must be fully involved in design and approval of trials • Studies that do not have informed consent from participants should not be published. BMJ 316: 1000-1005 [Full text]  
  • Bratt, D. E, Soutter, P., Bland, M., Little, P., Williamson, I., Chanter, D. O, Stewart-Brown, S., Thornton, H., Holmes, W., Ana, J. N E, Morley, C., Paul, M., Hassiotis, A, Hulbert, M. F G, Counsell, C. E, Sandercock, P. A G, Wilmshurst, P., Baum, M., Montgomery, C., Lydon, A., Lloyd, K., Wiltshire, C., Frosh, A C, Hanif, J (1997). Informed consent in medical research. BMJ 314: 1477-1477 [Full text]  
  • Doyal, L. (1997). Informed consent in medical research: Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent–with three exceptions. BMJ 314: 1107-1107 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Tobias, J. S (1997). BMJ's present policy (sometimes approving research in which patients have not given fully informed consent) is wholly correct. BMJ 314: 1111-1111 [Full text]  
  • Johnson, A G, Dixon, J M. (1997). Removing bias in surgical trials. BMJ 314: 916-916 [Full text]  
  • Kunkler, I., Tierney, A., Jodrell, N., Forbes, J. (1996). More use should be made of specialist nurses. BMJ 313: 1547b-1548 [Full text]  
  • Caulton, H. (1996). Support groups whose members have themselves had breast cancer are helpful. BMJ 313: 361-361 [Full text]  
  • Moodie, A. R (1996). Reply from dissenting author. BMJ 313: 362-362 [Full text]  
  • Friedli, K., King, M. (1996). Psychological support for patients having breast cancer surgery. BMJ 313: 360b-361 [Full text]  
  • Goodare, H. (1996). Patients' consent should have been sought. BMJ 313: 361a-361 [Full text]  
  • Lowe, D. (1996). Data may not have been summarised appropriately. BMJ 313: 361b-361 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ