General practice

Alterations in prescribing by general practitioner fundholders: an observational study

^a Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, ^b Department of Medicine, University of Liverpool

Correspondence to: Professor Walley.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare prescribing in general practices before and after they become fundholders to assess whether this affected prescribing patterns.
Design: Analysis of prescribing data (PACT) for one year before and one year after practices become first, second, or third wave fundholders and comparison with practices that were not fundholders during any part of the study.
Main outcome measures: Prescribing costs (net ingredient cost per prescribing unit), prescribing volume (items per 1000 prescribing units), net ingredient cost per item, and percentage of generic prescribing.
Setting: Former Mersey Regional Health Authority.
Subjects: 100 fundholders (20 first wave, 31 second wave, 49 third wave) and 312 non-fundholders.
Results: Prescribing costs and volume rose throughout the study in all groups. In all three fundholding waves the rate of increase of prescribing costs was significantly lower than for non-fundholders. Both cost per item and prescribing volume tended to decrease, the former probably because of a significant increase in generic prescribing. Fundholding and non-fundholding practices differed in several respects.
Conclusion: Fundholding has altered practice prescribing patterns compared with those of non-fundholders, increasing generic prescribing and reducing the rate of increase of prescribing costs.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Steinke, D. T., Bain, D. J. G., MacDonald, T. M., Davey, P. G. (2000). Practice factors that influence antibiotic prescribing in general practice in Tayside. J Antimicrob Chemother 46: 509-512 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Avery, A. J, Rodgers, S., Heron, T., Crombie, R., Whynes, D., Pringle, M., Baines, D., Petchey, R., Cole, T J (2000). A prescription for improvement? An observational study to identify how general practices vary in their growth in prescribing costs Commentary: Beware regression to the mean. BMJ 321: 276-281 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Rafferty, T., Wilson-Davis, K., McGavock, H. (1997). How has fundholding in Northern Ireland affected prescribing patterns? A longitudinal study. BMJ 315: 166-170 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gosden, T., Torgerson, D., Maynard, A. (1997). What is to be done about fundholding?. BMJ 315: 170-171 [Full text]  
• Pryce, A J, Heatlie, H F, Chapman, S R (1996). Buccaling under the pressure: influence of secondary care establishments on the prescribing of glyceryl trinitrate buccal tablets in primary care. BMJ 313: 1621-1624 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Harris, C. M, Scrivener, G. (1996). Fundholders' prescribing costs: the first five years. BMJ 313: 1531-1534 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bateman, D N, Campbell, M, Donaldson, L J, Roberts, S J, Smith, J M (1996). A prescribing incentive scheme for non-fundholding general practices: an observational study. BMJ 313: 535-538 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wilson, R, Walley, T (1996). Effects of fundholding on prescribing habits. BMJ 312: 848-848 [Full text]  
• Robinson, E. (1996). Other factors probably explain differences in prescribing. BMJ 312: 849-849 [Full text]  
• Trimble, I., Black, D. (1996). Prescribing by general practitioner fundholders. BMJ 312: 848c-849 [Full text]  
• Erwin, J., Britten, N., Jones, R. (1996). General practitioners' views on over the counter sales by community pharmacists. BMJ 312: 617-618 [Full text]