Papers

Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool diabetic eye study

^a St Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, ^b Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Correspondence to: Mr. Harding.+Michael White died on 13 August 1995.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate different methods for community based screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease.
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: Mobile screening unit visiting inner city community clinics; hospital assessment clinic (tertiary centre).
Subjects: 395 diabetic patients registered with four general practices in an inner city location.
Interventions: Community based photography with mydriasis and direct ophthalmoscopy through dilated pupils by an experienced ophthalmologist, both compared with reference standard of slit lamp biomicroscopy by a consultant specialist in medical retinal disease.
Main outcome measures: Sensitivity and specificity of screening method and prevalence of sight threatening diabetic eye disease (moderate preproliferative retinopathy, circinate maculopathy, exudate within 1 disc diameter of fixation, other diabetes related eye disease).
Results: 358 subjects underwent photography, 326 attended hospital clinic for ophthalmoscopy, and six were ungradable on photographs and biomicroscopy, leaving 320 for analysis. Of these 295 (91%) attended clinic within four months of photography. Sensitivity of detection of eye disease by photography was 89% (95% confidence interval 80% to 98%), significantly better than for direct ophthalmoscopy (65% (51% to 79%)). Analysis of patients with false negative results indicated possible improvement of photographic sensitivity to 93% by addition of stereoscopic macular pair photographs. Specificity of detection of sight threatening eye disease was 86% (82% to 90%) for photography and 97% (95% to 99%) for direct ophthalmoscopy.
Conclusions: Since high sensitivity is essential for an effective screening programme, a photographic method should be considered as preferred option in national, community based screening programmes. Even in the hands of an experienced ophthalmologist, direct ophthalmoscopy is limited by weaknesses inherent to the instrument.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy

Colin Clements, Clive B Prince, Somdutt Prasad, Anil Aralikatti, Helen Swindlehurst, and Louis G Clearkin
BMJ 2002 324: 849. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Smith, T. S T, Szetu, J., Bourne, R. R A (2007). The prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy, associated risk factors and vision loss in patients registered with type 2 diabetes in Luganville, Vanuatu. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 91: 415-419 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Taylor, C. R., Merin, L. M., Salunga, A. M., Hepworth, J. T., Crutcher, T. D., O'Day, D. M., Pilon, B. A. (2007). Improving Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Ratios Using Telemedicine-Based Digital Retinal Imaging Technology: The Vine Hill Study. Diabetes Care 30: 574-578 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Saldanha, M J, Meyer-Bothling, U (2006). Outcome of implementing the national services framework guidelines for diabetic retinopathy screening: results of an audit in a primary care trust. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90: 122-122 [Full text]  
• Murgatroyd, H, Ellingford, A, Cox, A, Binnie, M, Ellis, J D, MacEwen, C J, Leese, G P (2004). Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88: 920-924 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Neubauer, A. S., Welge-Lussen, U. C., Thiel, M. J., Alge, C., Priglinger, S. G., Hirneiss, C., Ulbig, M. W., Kampik, A. (2003). Tele-Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy With the Retinal Thickness Analyzer. Diabetes Care 26: 2890-2897 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ciulla, T. A., Amador, A. G., Zinman, B. (2003). Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema: Pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies. Diabetes Care 26: 2653-2664 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Squirrell, D M, Talbot, J F (2003). Screening for diabetic retinopathy. JRSM 96: 273-276 [Full text]  
• Namperumalsamy, P., Nirmalan, P. K., Ramasamy, K. (2003). Developing a Screening Program to Detect Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy in South India. Diabetes Care 26: 1831-1835 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ong, G L, Ripley, L G, Newsom, R S B, Casswell, A G (2003). Assessment of colour vision as a screening test for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy before loss of vision. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87: 747-752 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• van Leiden, H. A., Dekker, J. M., Moll, A. C., Nijpels, G., Heine, R. J., Bouter, L. M., Stehouwer, C. D.A., Polak, B. C.P. (2002). Blood Pressure, Lipids, and Obesity Are Associated With Retinopathy: The Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care 25: 1320-1325 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gomez-Ulla, F., Fernandez, M. I., Gonzalez, F., Rey, P., Rodriguez, M., Rodriguez-Cid, M. J., Casanueva, F. F., Tome, M. A., Garcia-Tobio, J., Gude, F. (2002). Digital Retinal Images and Teleophthalmology for Detecting and Grading Diabetic Retinopathy. Diabetes Care 25: 1384-1389 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Clements, C., Prince, C. B, Prasad, S., Aralikatti, A., Swindlehurst, H., Clearkin, L. G (2002). National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 324: 849-849 [Full text]  
• Stellingwerf, C., Hardus, P. L.L.J., Hooymans, J. M.M. (2001). Two-Field Photography Can Identify Patients With Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy: A screening approach in the primary care setting. Diabetes Care 24: 2086-2090 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Prasad, S., Swindlehurst, H., Clearkin, L. G, Broughton, R. (2001). National screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 323: 998-998 [Full text]  
• Tong, L, Ang, A, Vernon, S A, Zambarakji, H J, Bhan, A, Sung, V, Page, S (2001). Sensitivity and specificity of a new scoring system for diabetic macular oedema detection using a confocal laser imaging system. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 85: 34-39 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hoogeveen, E. K., Kostense, P. J., Eysink, P. E. D., Polak, B. C. P., Beks, P. J., Jakobs, C., Dekker, J. M., Nijpels, G., Heine, R. J., Bouter, L. M., Stehouwer, C. D. A. (2000). Hyperhomocysteinemia Is Associated With the Presence of Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Hoorn Study. Arch Intern Med 160: 2984-2990 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• James, M., Turner, D. A, Broadbent, D. M, Vora, J., Harding, S. P (2000). Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease. BMJ 320: 1627-1631 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Melville, A., Richardson, R., Mason, J., McIntosh, A., O'Keeffe, C., Peters, J., Hutchinson, A. (2000). Complications of diabetes: screening for retinopathy and management of foot ulcers. Qual Saf Health Care 9: 137-141 [Full text]  
• Harper, R., Reeves, B. (1999). Compliance with Methodological Standards When Evaluating Ophthalmic Diagnostic Tests. IOVS 40: 1650-1657 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hirvela, H., Laatikainen, L. (1997). Diabetic retinopathy in people aged 70 years or older. The Oulu Eye Study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 81: 214-217 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hart, P M, Archer, D B, Atkinson, A B (1996). Screening for diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 312: 1670-1670 [Full text]  
• Hickey-Dwyer, M., Ellerby, S. (1996). Screening for sight threatening eye disease. BMJ 312: 440-440 [Full text]  
• Adab, P. (1996). Cost effectiveness of screening modalities must be determined. BMJ 312: 440a-440 [Full text]  
• Grey, R H B, Hart, J C D. (1996). Stereoscopic viewing of the retina needed to identify maculopathy. BMJ 312: 440b-440 [Full text]  
• (1995). WHAT'S THE BEST WAY TO SCREEN FOR DIABETIC EYE DISEASE?. JWatch General 1995: 6-6 [Full text]