Papers

Attitudes of consultant physicians to the Calman proposals: a questionnaire survey

^a Ealing Hospital, Southall, Middlesex UB1 3HW, ^b St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY

Correspondence to: Dr Mather.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the views of a large and representative group of consultant physicians on the Calman proposals, in which acute general medical services will change from being primarily consultant led to consultant provided.
Design: Postal questionnaires.
Subjects: All 236 consultant physicians in acute hospitals in North West and South West Thames regions.
Results: Replies were received from 179 (76%). One hundred and thirty seven (77%) indicated that they would not resume emergency residential duties, and 126 (71%) indicated that they would probably withdraw from general medical duties under these circumstances. One hundred and twenty six (70%) and 137 (77%) had not inserted a central venous line or temporary pacemaker, respectively, within the previous five years. Of 157 answering a question on the impact of the Calman proposals on the quality of patient services, 125 considered that it would be detrimental, and only 18 (11%) thought that it would be beneficial.
Conclusion: Most consultant physicians are not prepared to resume emergency duties and could not do so without retraining in practical procedures. There is widespread antagonism to the Calman proposals, and most physicians consider that their impact on the quality of patient services will be detrimental.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Attitudes of consultant physicians to Calman proposals

David London
BMJ 1995 311: 1573-1574. [Extract] [Full Text]

Proposals do not refer to need for consultant provided service

John G Temple
BMJ 1995 311: 1574. [Extract] [Full Text]

Present situation is detrimental to patient care

Olivia Williams and Paul Spiers
BMJ 1995 311: 1574. [Extract] [Full Text]

Survey illustrates misconception of the Calman proposals

J N Johnson
BMJ 1995 311: 1298. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Catto, G. (2000). Specialist registrar training. BMJ 320: 817-818 [Full text]  
• Paice, E., Aitken, M., Cowan, G., Heard, S. (2000). Trainee satisfaction before and after the Calman reforms of specialist training: questionnaire survey. BMJ 320: 832-836 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Paice, E., Leaver, P. (1999). Improving the training of SHOs. BMJ 318: 1022-1023 [Full text]  
• McQuillan, P., Pilkington, S., Allan, A., Taylor, B., Short, A., Morgan, G., Nielsen, M., Barrett, D., Smith, G. (1998). Confidential inquiry into quality of care before admission to intensive care. BMJ 316: 1853-1858 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Mather, H. M, Elkeles, R. S (1996). Attitude of consultant physicians to Calman proposals. BMJ 312: 443a-443 [Full text]  
• Taylor, B L, Pilkington, S N, Smith, G B, McQuillan, P J (1996). Who is responsible for quality of acute medical care?. BMJ 312: 443b-444 [Full text]  
• Temple, J. G (1995). Proposals do not refer to need for consultant provided service. BMJ 311: 1574-1574 [Full text]  
• London, D. (1995). Attitudes of consultant physicians to Calman proposals. BMJ 311: 1573c-1574 [Full text]  
• Williams, O., Spiers, P. (1995). Present situation is detrimental to patient care. BMJ 311: 1574a-1574 [Full text]  
• Johnson, J N (1995). Survey illustrates misconception of the Calman proposals. BMJ 311: 1298-1298 [Full text]