Papers

Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews

^a Department of Public Health Medicine and Health Policy, Oxfordshire Health, Oxford OX3 9DZ, ^b Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR

Correspondence to: Dr T Fahey, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR.

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the way in which the results of a randomised controlled trial and a systematic review are presented influences health policy decisions.
Design: A postal questionnaire to all members of a health authority within one regional health authority.
Setting: Anglia and Oxford regional health authorities.
Subjects: 182 executive and non-executive members of 13 health authorities, family health services authorities, or health commissions.
Main outcome measures: The average score from all health authority members in terms of their willingness to fund a mammography programme or cardiac rehabilitation programme according to four different ways of presenting the same results of research evidence--namely, as a relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, proportion of event free patients, or as the number of patients needed to be treated to prevent an adverse event.
Results: The willingness to fund either programme was significantly influenced by the way in which data were presented. Results of both programmes when expressed as relative risk reductions produced significantly higher scores when compared with other methods (P<0.05). The difference was more extreme for mammography, for which the outcome condition is rarer.
Conclusions: The method of reporting trial results has a considerable influence on the health policy decisions made by health authority members.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Ratio measures in leading medical journals: structured review of accessibility of underlying absolute risks

Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin, Evan L Dvorin, and H Gilbert Welch
BMJ 2006 333: 1248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography

Karsten Juhl Jørgensen and Peter C Gøtzsche
BMJ 2006 332: 538-541. [Full Text] [PDF]

Improving services with informatics tools

Frank Sullivan and Jeremy C Wyatt
BMJ 2005 331: 1190-1192. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Perception of risk is affected by presentation

Marion H Hall
BMJ 1995 311: 1229. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Schwartz, L. M, Woloshin, S., Dvorin, E. L, Welch, H G. (2006). Ratio measures in leading medical journals: structured review of accessibility of underlying absolute risks. BMJ 333: 1248-1248 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Geddes, J. (2006). Providing the best available evidence: INVITED COMMENTARY ON... THE ANTIDEPRESSANT TALE. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 12: 327-328 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Jorgensen, K. J., Gotzsche, P. C (2006). Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.. BMJ 332: 538-541 [Full text]  
• Sullivan, F., Wyatt, J. C (2005). Improving services with informatics tools. BMJ 331: 1190-1192 [Full text]  
• Kristiansen, I. S., Fineberg, S., Kristiansen, I. S., Christensen, P. M., Gyrd-Hansen, D., Visscher, D. W., Degnim, A. C., Hartmann, L. C., Elmore, J. G., Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Benign breast disease and breast cancer.. NEJM 353: 1856-1858 [Full text]  
• Halvorsen, P. A., Kristiansen, I. S. (2005). Decisions on Drug Therapies by Numbers Needed to Treat: A Randomized Trial. Arch Intern Med 165: 1140-1146 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Barratt, A., Wyer, P. C., Hatala, R., McGinn, T., Dans, A. L., Keitz, S., Moyer, V., for, G. G., The Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working, (2004). Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 1. Relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat. CMAJ 171: 353-358 [Full text]  
• Marshall, T., Mohammed, M. A., Rouse, A. (2004). A randomized controlled trial of league tables and control charts as aids to health service decision-making. Int J Qual Health Care 16: 309-315 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Adily, A, Ward, J (2004). Evidence based practice in population health: a regional survey to inform workforce development and organisational change. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 58: 455-460 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Pitches, D., Burls, A., Fry-Smith, A. (2003). How to make a silk purse from a sow's ear--a comprehensive review of strategies to optimise data for corrupt managers and incompetent clinicians. BMJ 327: 1436-1439 [Full text]  
• Neves-e-Castro, M. (2003). Menopause in crisis post-Women's Health Initiative? A view based on personal clinical experience. Hum Reprod 18: 2512-2518 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Heller, R. F, Buchan, I., Edwards, R., Lyratzopoulos, G., McElduff, P., Leger, S. S. (2003). Communicating risks at the population level: application of population impact numbers. BMJ 327: 1162-1165 [Full text]  
• Domenighetti, G., D'Avanzo, B., Egger, M., Berrino, F., Perneger, T., Mosconi, P., Zwahlen, M. (2003). Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries. Int J Epidemiol 32: 816-821 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gigerenzer, G., Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ 327: 741-744 [Full text]  
• Badrinath, P, Wakeman, A. P, Wakeman, J. G, Yudkin, J. S, Parmar, M. S, Twisselmann, B. (2002). Preventing stroke with ramipril. BMJ 325: 439-439 [Full text]  
• Nexoe, J., Gyrd-Hansen, D., Kragstrup, J., Kristiansen, I. S., Nielsen, J. B. (2002). Danish GPs' perception of disease risk and benefit of prevention. Fam Pract 19: 3-6 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Wells, J., Marshall, P., Crawley, B., Dickersin, K. (2001). Newspaper Reporting of Screening Mammography. ANN INTERN MED 135: 1029-1037 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Ebrahim, S. (2001). The Use of Numbers Needed to Treat Derived from Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis: Caveats and Pitfalls. Eval Health Prof 24: 152-164 [Abstract]  
• Moynihan, R., Bero, L., Ross-Degnan, D., Henry, D., Lee, K., Watkins, J., Mah, C., Soumerai, S. B. (2000). Coverage by the News Media of the Benefits and Risks of Medications. NEJM 342: 1645-1650 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Kee, F. (2000). Confidence limits and the limits of confidence. QJM 93: 121-124 [Full text]  
• Smeeth, L., Haines, A., Ebrahim, S. (1999). Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses---sometimes informative, usually misleading. BMJ 318: 1548-1551 [Full text]  
• Mancini, G. B. J., Schulzer, M. (1999). Reporting Risks and Benefits of Therapy by Use of the Concepts of Unqualified Success and Unmitigated Failure : Applications to Highly Cited Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine. Circulation 99: 377-383 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bunker, J. P, Houghton, J., Baum, M. (1998). Putting the risk of breast cancer in perspective. BMJ 317: 1307-1309 [Full text]  
• Slaytor, E. K, Ward, J. E (1998). How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets. BMJ 317: 263-264 [Full text]  
• Skolbekken, J. A. (1998). Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs. BMJ 316: 1956-1958 [Full text]  
• McCartney, E., van der Gaag, A. (1996). How shall we be judged? Speech and language therapists in educational settings. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 12: 314-327 [Abstract]  
• Tonks, A., Smith, R. (1996). Information in practice. BMJ 313: 438-438 [Full text]  
• Hall, M. H (1995). Perception of risk is affected by presentation. BMJ 311: 1229-1229 [Full text]