BMJ 1995;311:427-430 (12 August)

General practice

Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors

Jeremy Dale, senior lecturer in primary care,a Judith Green, research officer,a Fiona Reid, statistician,c Edward Glucksman, consultant,d Roger Higgs, professor b

a Departments of General Practice and Primary Care and Accident and Emergency Medicine, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry and King's College Hospital, London SE5 9PJ, b Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9PJ, c Department of Public Health, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, d Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS

Correspondence to: Dr Dale.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the process and outcome of "primary care" consultations undertaken by senior house officers, registrars, and general practitioners in an accident and emergency department.
Design: Prospective, controlled intervention study.
Setting: A busy, inner city accident and emergency department in south London.
Subjects: Patients treated during a stratified random sample of 419 three hour sessions between June 1989 and May 1990 assessed at nurse triage as presenting with problems that could be treated in a primary care setting. 1702 of these patients were treated by sessionally employed local general practitioners, 2382 by senior house officers, and 557 by registrars.
Main outcome measures: Process variables: laboratory and radiographic investigations, prescriptions, and referrals; outcome variables: results of investigations.
Results: Primary care consultations made by accident and emergency medical staff resulted in greater utilisation of investigative, outpatient, and specialist services than those made by general practitioners. For example, the odds ratios for patients receiving radiography were 2.78 (95% confidence interval 2.32 to 3.34) for senior house officer v general practitioner consultations and 2.37 (1.84 to 3.06) for registrars v general practitioners. For referral to hospital specialist on call teams or outpatient departments v discharge to the community the odds ratios were 2.88 (2.39 to 3.47) for senior house officers v general practitioners and 2.57 (1.98 to 3.35) for registrars v general practitioners.
Conclusion: Employing general practitioners in accident and emergency departments to manage patients with primary care needs seems to result in reduced rates of investigations, prescriptions, and referrals. This suggests important benefits in terms of resource utilisation, but the impact on patient outcome and satisfaction needs to be considered further.

Key messages

  • Key messages

  • REFERENCES

  • Senior house officer and registrar consultations involve considerably greater utilisation of hospital investigative and specialist resources

  • Benefits may follow from employing general practitioners as primary care physicians in accident and emergency departments

  • The impact of these differential rates of investigations and referrals on clinical outcome and patient satisfaction needs consideration

  • More emphasis should be placed on training accident and emergency doctors to develop their assessment and consultation skills for primary care management


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Cost of employing general practitioners in department may outweigh savings
Derek P Burke and Najam Rashid
BMJ 1995 311: 1438. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Moore, L, Deehan, A, Seed, P, Jones, R (2009). Characteristics of frequent attenders in an emergency department: analysis of 1-year attendance data. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 263-267 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Norredam, M., Mygind, A., Nielsen, A. S., Bagger, J., Krasnik, A. (2007). Motivation and relevance of emergency room visits among immigrants and patients of Danish origin. Eur J Public Health 17: 497-502 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Selasawati, H.G., Naing, L., Wan Aasim, W.A., Winn, T., Rusli, B.N. (2007). Factors Associated with Inappropriate Utilisation of Emergency Department Services. Asia Pac J Public Health 19: 29-36 [Abstract]  
  • Palmer, C D, Jones, K H, Jones, P A, Polacarz, S V, Evans, G W L (2005). Urban legend versus rural reality: patients' experience of attendance at accident and emergency departments in west Wales. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 165-170 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dale, J, Williams, S, Foster, T, Higgins, J, Snooks, H, Crouch, R, Hartley-Sharpe, C, Glucksman, E, George, S (2004). Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 363-373 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Forrest, C. B., Majeed, A., Weiner, J. P., Carroll, K., Bindman, A. B. (2003). Referral of Children to Specialists in the United States and the United Kingdom. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157: 279-285 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Olsson, M, Hansagi, H (2001). Repeated use of the emergency department: qualitative study of the patient's perspective. Emerg. Med. J. 18: 430-434 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coleman, P, Irons, R, Nicholl, J (2001). Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency?. Emerg. Med. J. 18: 482-487 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lloyd, G., Skarratts, D., Robinson, N., Reid, C. (2000). Communication skills training for emergency department senior house officers--a qualitative study. Emerg. Med. J. 17: 246-250 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Murphy, A. W, Plunkett, P. K, Bury, G., Leonard, C., Walsh, J., Lynam, F., Johnson, Z. (2000). Effect of patients seeing a general practitioner in accident and emergency on their subsequent reattendance: cohort study. BMJ 320: 903-904 [Full text]  
  • Rajpar, S. F, Smith, M. A, Cooke, M. W (2000). Study of choice between accident and emergency departments and general practice centres for out of hours primary care problems. Emerg. Med. J. 17: 18-21 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McLauchlan, C. A J, Harris, A, Marrow, J., Heyworth, J., Egleston, C., Essex, B (1998). Providing primary care in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 317: 207-207 [Full text]  
  • Robertson-Steel, I R S (1998). Providing primary care in the accident and emergency department. BMJ 316: 409-410 [Full text]  
  • Cooke, M. (1996). Employing general practitioners in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 313: 628a-628 [Full text]  
  • Dale, J., Lang, H., Roberts, J. A, Green, J., Glucksman, E. (1996). Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars. BMJ 312: 1340-1344 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Murphy, A. W, Bury, G., Plunkett, P. K, Gibney, D., Smith, M., Mullan, E., Johnson, Z. (1996). Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost. BMJ 312: 1135-1142 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rao, G P., Hughes, A (1995). Nurse triage may reduce workload in accident department. BMJ 311: 1575-1575 [Full text]  
  • Burke, D. P, Rashid, N. (1995). Cost of employing general practitioners in department may outweigh savings. BMJ 311: 1438a-1438 [Full text]  
  • Dale, J., Green, J., Reid, F., Glucksman, E. (1995). Primary care in the accident and emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients. BMJ 311: 423-426 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ