BMJ 1995;311:423-426 (12 August)

General practice

Primary care in the accident and emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients

Jeremy Dale, senior lecturer in primary care,a Judith Green, research officer,a Fiona Reid, statistician,b Edward Glucksman, consultant c

a Departments of General Practice and Primary Care and Accident and Emergency Medicine, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry and King's College Hospital, London SE5 9PJ, b Department of Public Health, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London SE5 9PJ, c Department of Accident and Emergency Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS

Correspondence to: Dr Dale.

Abstract

Objective: To compare patient characteristics and consultation activities for attenders at accident and emergency departments assessed by nurse triage as presenting with "primary care" or "accident and emergency" type problems.
Design: One year prospective study.
Setting: A busy, inner city accident and emergency department in south London.
Subjects: Of the 5658 patients treated for new problems during a stratified random sample of 204 three hour sessions between 10 am and 9 pm during June 1989 to May 1990, all "primary care" (2065 patients) and a 10% random sample of "accident and emergency" (291 patients) were included in the analysis.
Main outcome measures: Patient's age, sex, duration of presenting problem, diagnosis, laboratory and radiographic investigations, treatments, and referrals.
Results: 40.9% of attenders with new problems were classified by triage as presenting with "primary care" problems (95% confidence interval 39.6% to 42.2%). Primary care attenders were more likely than accident and emergency patients to be young adults, to have symptoms with a duration of longer than 24 hours, and to present problems not related to injury (all P<0.001). Accident and emergency patients were considerably more likely to be referred to on call teams and to be admitted. Even so, 9.7% of primary care patients were referred to on call teams and a further 8.9% were referred to the fracture clinic or advised to return to the accident and emergency department for follow up.
Conclusion: Accident and emergency triage can be developed to identify patients with problems that are more likely to be of a primary care type, and these patients are less likely to receive an investigation, minor surgical procedure, or referral. Many patients in this category, however, receive interventions likely to support their decision to attend accident and emergency rather than general practice. This may reflect limitations in the sensitivity of triage practice or a clinical approach of junior medical staff that includes a propensity to intervene.

Key messages

  • Key messages

  • Triage can be adapted to fulfil this purpose and differentiate patients into primary care and accident and emergency groups

  • The differences in the characteristics and care received by the two groups are not as distinct as expected

  • This may reflect limitations in the sensitivity of triage practice or aspects of the clinical approach of junior medical staff resulting in a propensity to intervene


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Primary care in accident and emergency departments
Jane Fothergill, R Touquet, and P Ward
BMJ 1995 311: 1438. [Extract] [Full Text]

Parents practise triage for paediatric attendances
Terry Bradley, Brigid Mccann, John Glasgow, and Chris Patterson
BMJ 1995 311: 1438. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Oterino de la Fuente, D., Banos Pino, J. F., Blanco, V. F., Alvarez, A. R. (2007). Does better access to primary care reduce utilization of hospital accident and emergency departments? A time-series analysis. Eur J Public Health 17: 186-192 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Leaman, A M, Rysdale, E, Webber, R (2006). Use of the emergency department by Polish migrant workers. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 918-919 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gunnarsdottir, O S, Rafnsson, V (2006). Mortality of the users of a hospital emergency department.. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 269-273 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Palmer, C D, Jones, K H, Jones, P A, Polacarz, S V, Evans, G W L (2005). Urban legend versus rural reality: patients' experience of attendance at accident and emergency departments in west Wales. Emerg. Med. J. 22: 165-170 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van Uden, C J T, Crebolder, H F J M (2004). Does setting up out of hours primary care cooperatives outside a hospital reduce demand for emergency care?. Emerg. Med. J. 21: 722-723 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Leibowitz, R., Day, S., Dunt, D. (2003). A systematic review of the effect of different models of after-hours primary medical care services on clinical outcome, medical workload, and patient and GP satisfaction. Fam Pract 20: 311-317 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rajpar, S. F, Smith, M. A, Cooke, M. W (2000). Study of choice between accident and emergency departments and general practice centres for out of hours primary care problems. Emerg. Med. J. 17: 18-21 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • McLauchlan, C. A J, Harris, A, Marrow, J., Heyworth, J., Egleston, C., Essex, B (1998). Providing primary care in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 317: 207-207 [Full text]  
  • Carlisle, R., Groom, L. M, Avery, A. J, Boot, D., Earwicker, S. (1998). Relation of out of hours activity by general practice and accident and emergency services with deprivation in Nottingham: longitudinal survey. BMJ 316: 520-523 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Robertson-Steel, I R S (1998). Providing primary care in the accident and emergency department. BMJ 316: 409-410 [Full text]  
  • Pringle, M. (1997). Primary care: opportunities and threats: Distributing primary care fairly. BMJ 314: 595-595 [Full text]  
  • Salisbury, C. (1997). Observational study of a general practice out of hours cooperative: measures of activity. BMJ 314: 182-182 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Dale, J., Lang, H., Roberts, J. A, Green, J., Glucksman, E. (1996). Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars. BMJ 312: 1340-1344 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Murphy, A. W, Bury, G., Plunkett, P. K, Gibney, D., Smith, M., Mullan, E., Johnson, Z. (1996). Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost. BMJ 312: 1135-1142 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rao, G P., Hughes, A (1995). Nurse triage may reduce workload in accident department. BMJ 311: 1575-1575 [Full text]  
  • Fothergill, J., Touquet, R, Ward, P (1995). Primary care in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 311: 1438-1438 [Full text]  
  • Bradley, T., Mccann, B., Glasgow, J., Patterson, C. (1995). Parents practise triage for paediatric attendances. BMJ 311: 1438b-1438 [Full text]  
  • Bindman, A. B (1995). Triage in accident and emergency departments. BMJ 311: 404-404 [Full text]  
  • Dale, J., Green, J., Reid, F., Glucksman, E., Higgs, R. (1995). Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors. BMJ 311: 427-430 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ