BMJ 1995;311:93-97 (8 July)

General practice

Randomised controlled trial of teaching general practitioners to carry out structured assessments of their long term mentally ill patients

Tony Kendrick, senior lecturer in general practice and primary care,a Tom Burns, professor of community psychiatry,a Paul Freeling, emeritus professor of general practice a

a St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE

Correspondence to: Dr Kendrick.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact of teaching general practitioners to carry out structured assessments of their long term mentally ill patients.
Design: Randomised controlled trial.
Setting: Sixteen group general practices in South Thames (west) region.
Subjects: 440 adults disabled by long term mental illness.
Interventions: Patients were identified by using practice data with help from local psychiatric and social services. In eight practices the practitioners were taught a structured assessment schedule to use with patients every six months for two years.
Main outcome measures: Changes in drug treatments, referrals, consultation rates, and recording of preventive health data in the two years after intervention.
Results: Follow up data were available on 373 patients (84.7%). At least one structured assessment was recorded for 127 patients in the intervention group but only 29 had four assessments recorded. Participating practitioners considered the structured assessment to be time consuming and reported that it did not often lead directly to changes in treatment or referrals. Changes in treatment with neuroleptic drugs and referrals to community psychiatric nurses, however, were significantly more frequent in the intervention group (differences for intervention group minus control group adjusted for activity in two years before intervention were 14.3% (95% confidence interval 4.3% to 24.33%; P<0.01) for neuroleptic drugs and 13.3% (2.0% to 24.6%;P<0.05) for referrals). There were no significant differences in psychiatric admissions, use of the Mental Health Act, drug overdoses, prescriptions, referrals or admissions for physical problems, consultation rates, continuity of care, or recording of preventive data.
Conclusions: Teaching general practitioners about the problems of long term mentally ill patients may increase their involvement in patients' psychiatric care. Regular structured assessments do not seem feasible in routine surgery appointments. More training for general practitioners and increased resources such as more nurse time may be necessary if improvements in care of long term mentally ill patients in general practice are to be generalised.

Key messages

  • Key messages

  • General practitioners do not review chronic mental illnesses as often as they do chronic physical illnesses

  • Teaching general practitioners to carry out structured assessments of their long term mentally ill patients was associated with increases in changes of treatment and referrals

  • This increased activity may have resulted from an increased awareness of the patients or increased knowledge about their problems rather than being a direct result of the structured assessments

  • General practitioners need more training in the management of long term mentally ill patients


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Royal, S, Smeaton, L, Avery, A J, Hurwitz, B, Sheikh, A (2006). Interventions in primary care to reduce medication related adverse events and hospital admissions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 15: 23-31 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lester, H. (2005). Shared care for people with mental illness: a GP's perspective. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 11: 133-139 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Byng, R., Norman, I., Redfern, S. (2005). Using Realistic Evaluation to Evaluate a Practice-level Intervention to Improve Primary Healthcare for Patients with Long-term Mental Illness. Evaluation 11: 69-93 [Abstract]  
  • Andreoli, P. B. d. A., Citero, V. d. A., Mari, J. d. J. (2003). A Systematic Review of Studies of the Cost-Effectiveness of Mental Health Consultation-Liaison Interventions in General Hospitals. Psychosomatics 44: 499-507 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Perkins, R., Burns, T. (2001). Home Treatment. Int J Soc Psychiatry 47: 55-66 [Abstract]  
  • Dowrick, C. (2001). Advances in psychiatric treatment in primary care. Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 7: 1-8 [Full text]  
  • WARNER, J. P., KING, M., BLIZARD, R., McCLENAHAN, Z., TANG, S. (2000). Patient-held shared care records for individuals with mental illness: Randomised controlled evaluation. Br. J. Psychiatry 177: 319-324 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Worrall, G., Angel, J., Chaulk, P., Clarke, C., Robbins, M. (1999). Effectiveness of an educational strategy to improve family physicians' detection and management of depression: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 161: 37-40 [Abstract] [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ