BMJ 1994;309:983-986 (15 October)
Papers
Glycated haemoglobin values: problems in assessing blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus
E S Kilpatrick,
A G Rumley,
M H Dominiczak,
M Small
Department of Pathological Biochemistry, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow G12 OYN Diabetic Unit, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow G12 OYN Correspondence to: Dr Kilpatrick, lipid and diabetes laboratory.
Abstract
Objective : To see whether two measures of glycated haemoglobin concentration - the haemoglobin A1 (HbA1) value and the haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value - assess blood glucose control differently in diabetes.
Design : Diabetic patients had glycaemic control assessed on the basis of HbA1 and HbA1c values measured by the same high performance liquid chromatography instrument and on the basis of HbA1 measured by electrophoresis.
Setting : A diabetic outpatient clinic.
Subjects : 208 diabetic patients and 106 non-diabetic controls.
Main outcome measures : Glycated haemoglobin concentrations classified according to European guidelines as representing good, borderline, or poor glycaemic control by using standard deviations from a reference mean.
Results : Fewer patients were in good control (25;12%) and more poorly controlled (157;75%) as assessed by the HbA1c value compared with both HbA1 assays (39 (19%) and 130 (63%) respectively when using high performance liquid chromatography; 63 (30%) and 74 (36%) when using electrophoresis). The median patient value was 8.0 SD from the reference mean when using HbA1c, 5.9 when using HbA1 measured by the same high performance liquid chromatography method, and 4.1 when using HbA1 measured by electrophoresis.
Conclusions : Large differences exist between HbA1 and HbA1c in the classification of glycaemic control in diabetic patients. The HbA1c value may suggest a patient is at a high risk of long term diabetic complications when the HbA1 value may not. Better standardisation of glycated haemoglobin measurements is advisable.
|
Clinical implications
- Clinical implications
- Improved glucose control in diabetic patients reduces the risk of long term microvascular complications
- HbA1 and HbA1c are glycated haemoglobins commonly measured to give an indication of glycaemic control over the preceding six to eight weeks
- In this series HbA1 measurement classified fewer patients as poorly controlled and more as well controlled in comparison with HbA1c
- Patients may thus appear to be at less risk of long term complications when HbA1 concentration rather than the more specific HbA1c concentration is measured
- until standardisation to HbA1c measurement occurs doctors should be aware that care is required with the interpretation of glycated haemoglobin measurements
|

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Related Articles
-
Standardisation is essential
- W D Alexander and K R Paterson
BMJ 1994 309: 1511.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Methodological discrepancies are not important
- A S Wierzbicki, M Bickel, and T M Reynolds
BMJ 1994 309: 1511.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ruggenenti, P., Fassi, A., Ilieva, A. P., Bruno, S., Iliev, I. P., Brusegan, V., Rubis, N., Gherardi, G., Arnoldi, F., Ganeva, M., Ene-Iordache, B., Gaspari, F., Perna, A., Bossi, A., Trevisan, R., Dodesini, A. R., Remuzzi, G., the Bergamo Nephrologic Diabetes Complications Tri,
(2004). Preventing Microalbuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes. NEJM
351: 1941-1951
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Selvin, E., Marinopoulos, S., Berkenblit, G., Rami, T., Brancati, F. L., Powe, N. R., Golden, S. H.
(2004). Meta-Analysis: Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes Mellitus. ANN INTERN MED
141: 421-431
[Abstract]
[Full text]
-
Kilpatrick, E. S
(2000). Glycated haemoglobin in the year 2000. J. Clin. Pathol.
53: 335-339
[Full text]
-
Standing, S., Taylor, R.
(1995). Assessing blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus. BMJ
310: 740a-740
[Full text]
-
Bulusu, S
(1995). Variant haemoglobin may affect measurements. BMJ
310: 740b-740
[Full text]
-
Goldie, D. J, Gunneberg, A.
(1995). Like should be compared with like. BMJ
310: 740c-741
[Full text]
-
Alexander, W D, Paterson, K R
(1994). Standardisation is essential. BMJ
309: 1511-1511
[Full text]
-
Wierzbicki, A S, Bickel, M, Reynolds, T M
(1994). Methodological discrepancies are not important. BMJ
309: 1511a-1511
[Full text]
-
Hassan, M K, Neary, R H, Scarpello, J H
(1994). Derive reference range locally. BMJ
309: 1511b-1512
[Full text]
-
(1994). MARKED DIFFERENCES IN GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN TESTS. JWatch General
1994: 3-3
[Full text]